Interesting Roster Idea
From Ross Tucker:
"Really need limit on roster spots in salary cap league? If teams want to carry 58 dudes and fit them under $170M why not?"
I like it. For the players' association, it means more guys getting paid. For teams, it allows them more tools to work with. Obviously average salary goes down a little if teams go with more guys, but it would open up more opportunity for players.
Let each team manage it however they want. If you can get by with 55 guys, fine. If you want to have more players, fine, but you need to manage your roster and cap situation better than the other teams.
What do you guys think? What are the problems with this idea that would make it not workable?
From Ross Tucker:
"Really need limit on roster spots in salary cap league? If teams want to carry 58 dudes and fit them under $170M why not?"
I like it. For the players' association, it means more guys getting paid. For teams, it allows them more tools to work with. Obviously average salary goes down a little if teams go with more guys, but it would open up more opportunity for players.
Let each team manage it however they want. If you can get by with 55 guys, fine. If you want to have more players, fine, but you need to manage your roster and cap situation better than the other teams.
What do you guys think? What are the problems with this idea that would make it not workable?