DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter Joined Feb 8, 2005 Messages 48,633 Reaction score 30,146 Sep 2, 2006 Branch to the Jets for McCareins and their #1. Then, Rodney would have 2 games a year to take Branch's head off for being an imbecile.
Branch to the Jets for McCareins and their #1. Then, Rodney would have 2 games a year to take Branch's head off for being an imbecile.
Remix 6 Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal Joined Mar 24, 2006 Messages 7,780 Reaction score 2 Sep 2, 2006 i would too..i would like a top 5 pick
VrabelMayeWin PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter Joined Sep 13, 2004 Messages 35,724 Reaction score 7,843 Sep 2, 2006 We wouldn't get the jesters #1 for Branch alone.
D dhamz In the Starting Line-Up Joined Sep 16, 2004 Messages 3,188 Reaction score 35 Sep 2, 2006 Why would you mind that? Branch isn't even likely to bring a late #1 nevermind the Jets #1 which is a lock to be top 10 plus a player.
Why would you mind that? Branch isn't even likely to bring a late #1 nevermind the Jets #1 which is a lock to be top 10 plus a player.
DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter Joined Feb 8, 2005 Messages 48,633 Reaction score 30,146 Sep 2, 2006 dhamz said: Why would you mind that? Branch isn't even likely to bring a late #1 nevermind the Jets #1 which is a lock to be top 10 plus a player. Click to expand... I'd be willing to bet that Branch brings better than the equivalent of a #1 pick. Especially since that is what is being discussed with the Seahawks from last reports.
dhamz said: Why would you mind that? Branch isn't even likely to bring a late #1 nevermind the Jets #1 which is a lock to be top 10 plus a player. Click to expand... I'd be willing to bet that Branch brings better than the equivalent of a #1 pick. Especially since that is what is being discussed with the Seahawks from last reports.
patsox23 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract Joined Sep 13, 2004 Messages 7,430 Reaction score 60 Sep 2, 2006 I'll take the #1. No thanks on McCareins. He's a scrub.