I'll believe a decline when I see it
My thoughts exactly. I'm not much for the word or concept of "deserve", whether in sports or life in general, so to change the semantics a bit, if anybody'd ever
earned the right to play until it was obvious he couldn't, it's Tom Brady. Michael Jordan might have 7 or 8 rings if the Bulls didn't rush into shoving the whole dynasty out the back door to make way for the next generation (and...y'know, if he hadn't gotten secretly suspended for gambling a literal 8-peat might have been possible). In any case, it woulda been cool to see the older Bulls squad play the Spurs in '99 or Lakers in '00 (win or lose) instead of just fading away into the ether. I would rather watch the Patriots and 44-year-old Tom Brady lose the Super Bowl to the JG-led Bears than I would see the Patriots let Tom go before his time.
This should be instructive to the Patriots, and week-to-week, game-to-game as their micro approach may be, Kraft and Bill are men old enough and macro enough to think about legacy - Tom is too, for that matter. Play for the present - when you believe Tom Brady isn't your best option
this year to win the Super Bowl, then come talk to me. Has anyone seen anything besides Tom Brady's birth date, and the career history of far less physically fit and devoted QBs, to suggest that time is coming soon? Call me a ****ty TB-first Patriots fan if you want, but YES, I'd rather have a few more shots at the SB for TB than I would for a hypothetically (and that's all it is) slightly longer future with JG.
Anyone watching Tom for his whole career should realize that we are all witnesses to one of the all-time great team athletes in the history of modern-day sports. The number of people willing to walk away from that for what they've seen in 6 quarters of football is either remarkable, idiotic, genius, unhinged, or baffling. But I digress...yeah I believe Tom can play until he's 45. 50...he'd be pushing it.