You're an unabashed "QB magic" guy... right.
So Andy Reid, Mahomes and one of the most expensive offensive line isn't a better situation than what Gesicki was handed in Miami with Ryan Fitzpatrick, a revolving door of offensive coaches, an average to bad offensive line and half the targets as Kelce? He gets half the targets as David Andrews. He gets half the targets as Kittle.
Receiving weapons don't throw themselves the ball.
Either better QB's and situations matter or they don't. At least be consistent with this QB's are magical unicorns nonsense.
You’re moving the goal posts. What I am or am not is irrelevant to whether or not Henry and Gesicki are “great” TEs.
The second paragraph does nothing to bolster your point that they are “great” TEs. Those are mere excuses to avoid admitting that maybe you’re a little too high on them.
The third paragraph? These two will have Mac Jones throwing the ball. You’ve recently said “Zappe is breathing down his neck.” Using that to bolster your argument that both are “great” TEs is odd, at best, and intellectually dishonest at worst.
The fourth paragraph is, again, irrelevant. These are not great TEs. They’re not even top 5. Henry is a 2nd tier TE at best and Gesicki is a 3rd tier. They are what they are.
As I said, they’re still a good fit for the O and they’re one of the better TE rooms in the NFL, but nobody is putting them ahead of the Kelces, Kittles, Andrews, Wallers, Hockensens, and Goederts of the NFL. Kelce, Kittle, Andrews, Waller, and Goedert are the top 5. Kelce, Kittle, and Andrews are the top 3 (I.E., great). Who out of that list are you putting Henry or Gesicki over?