Every writer that questions that pats

[stattry]

offseason moves is a no-talent, unoriginal hack.

The writers that claim every single off-season move the pats made will likely work out has real insight and is thinking for him/herself.

 

[BadMoFo]

And this required its own thread, why?

 

[Patriotic Fervor]

And this required its own thread, why?

What do you expect with rookies?

 

[PATRIOT64]

So I guess every sportswriter who picks the Patriots to win the Super Bowl is correct and intelligent and the ones that predict San Diego or New Orleans are A--Holes and stupid?

What are you,like 14 years old posting this?

 

[khayos]

What do you expect with rookies?

I thereby resurrect my call for the ability to start a new thread to be limited to at least 100 posts (if not more).

 

[gomezcat]

People can start whatever threads they want, no matter how many posts. I have this really clever system for threads that don't interest me. It's called NOT READING THEM. If I do read it, and it's not what I thought it would be, I move on. If I am on an internet forum, I'm clearly not rushed off my feet at work, am I? ;-)

 

[gomezcat]

offseason moves is a no-talent, unoriginal hack.

The writers that claim every single off-season move the pats made will likely work out has real insight and is thinking for him/herself.

The problem is that these people have to sell stuff. As we all know, one of the best ways is to create controversy. I suspect that's what a lot of people do. The other thing to bear in mind is that people hate a winner. I know the teams I hate have been successful in all honesty.

 

[zippo59]

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Doesn't necessarily make them wrong. . .yet.

 

[A.C Vegas]

I think this person might have been being sarcastic becuase we get a lot of people on this board that think just like that.
I hate the constant Basking or bashing to but i know there as got to be a little truth to what is being said.