Patriots Local Newsfeed:

SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Patriots.com


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:CSNNE


SOURCE:NFL.com


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:MASSLive


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:Boston.com


SOURCE:NFL.com


SOURCE:WEEI


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:NESN


SOURCE:Providence Journal


SOURCE:NESN

Patsfans.com


Upcoming Opponent:
Next Up: N/A
Right Now At PatsFans.com:
Point Proven
The critics have blasted them all season, but Sunday night the Patriots defense proved that they really are better than people think.


Current Patriots Twitter Feed:

ICYMI - https://t.co/zdZKzKfWnU The roster turnover since then on the Patriots illustrates why NFL can be short for Not For Long.

Patriots have achieved tough task of earning Bill Belichick's respect, as coach tips his cap to players. https://t.co/VCG47CCvP9 #Patriots

@ryjacques U watch stupid. they pay nfl because you watch. so stop watching. do us both a favor.

@rtmcnamara @ryjacques Then why you writing to me? I didn't write u.

@ricked82 Not that I've heard of. I doubt it.

👀👀👀👀 this was my show back in the day lol https://t.co/PRT0rWrFqm

@PeterIBreen it's weird because he knows football. Just a strange blind spot

@ricked82 By every statistical measure, any analytic, Ryan and Brady were 1-2 this season.

RT @MiamiHEAT: #HEATwin ! Your @MiamiHEAT defeat the Golden State Warriors 105-102 for their 4th consecutive victory! #HEATwin https://t.c…

RT @PlayersTribune: "Pats fans y’all are spoiled. Yeah, I said it. Spoiled. Winning will do that." https://t.co/PFxrazZJfH

@MarcusPapas he whiffed on at least back-to-back plays, but I haven't gotten there yet

Did you know that Mike was asked to coach? 92. ... 93. ... https://t.co/F4wsYrzaS0

Patriots knew exactly how Steelers would react, to the point that Edelman never stopped moving, started walking to new spot.

RT @SportsCenter: Tom Brady is on the cover for ESPN The Magazine's Super Bowl Preview Issue. https://t.co/u5NKMkgtbw

That was the Patriots toying with, out-coaching the Steelers. One team was playing chess, other checkers.


Eve Of The Draft Rumours

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by manxman2601, May 7, 2014.

  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    24,891
    Likes Received:
    694
    Ratings:
    +2,743
    OK, I'll state the obvious. If Mallett is gone (for whatever), who would the replacement be that Belichick would trust as a backup?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +115
    I
    I think you give us way too much credit.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. manxman2601

    manxman2601 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    24,565
    Likes Received:
    3,923
    Ratings:
    +14,682
    This Mallett rumour lends some support to the Peter King Bortles story if it is the Pats interested. There was also that story about the Patriots loving Tom Savage and the Mike Glennon link.
     
  4. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +115
    Exactly. I think the operating theory is that Belichick then spends a high pick on a quarterback. But this doesn't leave us any better off, and potentially worse. What good is an extra pick if you're now forced to use it to fill the hole you've just created?
    I
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Big-T

    Big-T Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,389
    Likes Received:
    1,364
    Ratings:
    +4,343
    In years past, despite being told by numerous people to stop doing it, people have still posted spoilers.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  6. VrabelJr

    VrabelJr Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    821
    Ratings:
    +4,132
    Garropolo, Savage and McCarron seem like possibilities to me for rounds 3 and beyond. I don't think we draft a QB higher than the 3rd unless Brady and BB have already had talks about a 1-2 year succession plan for Brady.
     
  7. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +115
    Here? Who here has the connections to spoil a pick, assuming we're watching live? We might guess and occasionally be right, but I doubt anybody tips picks here.
    ?
     
  8. Galeb

    Galeb PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2013
    Messages:
    4,770
    Likes Received:
    1,233
    Ratings:
    +6,393
    ESPN often shows reactions of players on their phones before the pick is announced.
     
  9. Big-T

    Big-T Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,389
    Likes Received:
    1,364
    Ratings:
    +4,343
    They copy & paste Tweets from the likes of LaCanfora, who generally know the pick a few minutes before it's announced on stage.

    So if you don't want picks spoiled, try and avoid Twitter too.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  10. VrabelJr

    VrabelJr Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    821
    Ratings:
    +4,132
    Ok, a few tweets after Curran mentioned the Mallet trade he sent out a tweet wondering if Tebow could be coming back because a recent video of him working with Trent Dilfer "looked good."

    Let's all just agree Curran is trying to get some clicks and views and move along.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Hammer of Thor

    Hammer of Thor PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    624
    Ratings:
    +3,445
    The advantage is that they have this new QB on a rookie deal for 4 (maybe 5) years. Otherwise, they have Mallet for 2014 only, and there is no way he would resign here - he'd want a chance to start - and if he did, it would be at a much higher cap charge. They may like one of the QBs in this draft that much, and don't want to risk being forced into drafting a QB next year when they may not like anyone, or signing a high priced vet as a backup.
     
  12. manxman2601

    manxman2601 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    24,565
    Likes Received:
    3,923
    Ratings:
    +14,682
    What Hammer of Thor said. They could be getting the next three to four years of backup QB for free basically (aside from wages). and if the rumours of them liking Savage or Glennon are right, then things work out even better. They pretty much have to use a pick on a QB anyway, this gives us the extra pick to do it.
     
  13. jboston19

    jboston19 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    145
    Ratings:
    +634
    I didn't see it mentioned, but Curran claimed it'd be for their 3rd round pick.
     
  14. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ratings:
    +115
    I understand that, but unless there's something going on with Brady, it's curious. They need to replace Mallett, not Brady, or they be in this same position again, so as you say, they would need to be confident that a quarterback in this draft is going to be a superstar and be willing to get no return on a high pick for a number of years. It makes more sense to have Mallett for the year and take a comp pick, or to trade him during the pre-season, after BB knows he has a capable alternative, and another team may realize they're up a creek and pay more.

    There's too much talent in this draft to spend a high pick on a QB because you traded a QB, who some fans believe is better than any quarterback available in the draft yet want to swap him for a quarterback in this draft.

    Don't get me wrong -- if a Murray or a Metterberger happen to be available late in the third, than I'm cool drafting him. But 1) there's no way to tell that now, and 2) there's always the chance they won't make it and we'll have to spend more resources on a fall-back plan.

    I also wouldn't bet against Curran's Source being this messageboard.
     
  15. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    54,195
    Likes Received:
    4,925
    Ratings:
    +25,596
    https://twitter.com/BenVolin/status/464508871231688705

    https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/464509944973512704
     
  16. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    13,636
    Likes Received:
    1,848
    Ratings:
    +7,257
    IMO there's no such thing as a draft spoiler these days, given the number of different media streams available. You can follow the picks on tv, radio, NFL.com, Twitter, etc. and reports trickle out at all different times.
     

Share This Page

LOGIN | REGISTER