I don't post here often but I just have to rant and probably a long rant for my own sanity
Tom Brady's INNOCENT! That's where all the evidence leads yet an incredible propaganda campaign in the NFL to cover their own butt is what people want to buy because they hate people on top.
The people that want to say he's guilty use a logical approach. The cell phone is not available on the date he was meeting with Wells!
He calls himself the deflator and the idea it's weight loss is laughable !
locker room attendant texting back-and-forth about getting free stuff from Brady and inflating the balls to high levels !
to these people this is evidence of guilt because who would destroy cell phone the day they meet the investigator, what are the odds someone call himself Deflator and then later be accused of deflating footballs, that's it, that's all the logic they need! Guilty!
However if you use actual logic you should then say the following
- Tom Brady cares so much about the pressure in the balls that he's OK with the ball attendant letting out air Random PSI levels?
- Brady, like most powerful wealthy people, change their cell phone regularly and the fact he came back into the country after the Super Bowl, it makes kind of a lot of sense for him to change his cell phone then, it also makes sense to meet with Wells when you get back into the country, I'm sure he planned a lot of things for when he got back into the country because there's something you're not going to do while you're out of the country and on vacation so taking care of things when you get back probably bunch up a lot of those things to the same timeframe, I bet he did his laundry around the same day as he met with Wells, maybe you should investigate whether he had evidence on his clothing!
- Why was the other cell phone available? well maybe he just put it aside and then someone forgot to destroy it or he kept it as a backup but since he was switching to an IPhone which is a different platform he had no need for a backup phone. Since he seems to switch phones every few months it seems like that would be Hundreds of phones available that were not destroyed but there seems there were one or two which leads credence to his position that he normally destroys the cell phones. And since deflating was going on since 2013 why would he keep that phone because it must be evidence on there too
- Wells insinuated that deflating had been going on for a while because of May 2014 text the guy calls himself The Deflator but the cell phones from before November 2014 were of no interest to them. WHAT?
- in regards to the deflator text. The second use of the word deflate in all the texts were in the Green Bay game but he tells the guy to deflate and get rid of the jacket at the exact time the guys on TV wearing a ton of clothes which makes him look like he's 300 pounds and trying to give Jacket to a player, please tell me what logic anybody can use that that text had anything to do with deflating balls and since he's already ripping him about the jacket is it then possible and likely ribbing him about looking large on TV and telling him to deflate. If that is the use of the word clearly has nothing to do with deflating footballs then how can they use a 2014 text as any evidence related to deflating footballs.
- Brady has a future HOF vote years down the line and these two equipment guys know what went on. Tom Brady comes out explicitly says he's not guilty and then one of these guys comes out years later or NEXT WEEK and says he was Guilty and Tom did it and this person can probably get a large payday for the story and discredit Tom. There is no logic to Tom putting his entire reputation on the line when there are two guys that could rat him out at anytime.
- also I saw some analysis which indicated they could show that the patriots logo was used on the patriot balls for the game if that's true then none of the balls were out of spec even going by Wells own report, never mind the fact that the science is shoddy and everyone has discredited it and the only two people that seem to agree with it are the ones the NFL paid to testify for them
-If the guy calls himself the deflator and it is evidence of guilt in 2014 that means in the 2013 season he was doing this yet somehow in the AFC championship game this is the only time any referee remembers him taking the balls special like he did So if he has been doing this for three seasons how did he do it ? He never took the balls like he did on the AFC championship game so how is he doing it all this time? Wait, what? there is absolutely zero evidence other than one text that anything was going on with PSI and balls before the Jets game? So why would anybody logically think the text in May 2014 had anything to do with the deflating footballs? Only because in January 2015 he was accused of doing that . Logic would dictate that would have to be some evidence before that day but there isn't
- also why would a guy say that he would have Brady's footballs over inflated and that only his passer rating would deflate? Well could be perhaps that he told the referees what PSI to put into the ball ? He could easily have told the ref that Tom Brady likes the balls and 13.5, saying jokingly to get back at Tom that the balls would not be to his liking does not mean that he was going to physically mess with the balls himself, he did not have to, he was the guy that told the refs what the pressure was to be!
- why would the patriots get rid of the ball boys if they were innocent ! That's the dumbest question any writer can ask but I saw it in an article today by some moron. Clearly the Patriots and Brady believe they are innocent as they vehemently have said this. The NFL told him they were going to suspend these guys and as Kraft has mentioned several times, even today, when negotiating sometimes you have to bite the bullet for the long-term good . It was better for the patriots to tell the guys they were being suspended then have the NFL force them to suspend them. Unless Bob Kraft was willing to go to court and fight he had no other choice . This was a joint decision in conversations with the NFL and a way to show the Pats would cooperate in anyway and I sincerely believe that Bob Kraft believed doing what the NFL wanted would eventually lead to Brady been exonerated. A logical person would say that the Patriots would not have fired these guys if anything had happened because the Patriots Are denying anything happened, what logic is there that they would fire people and piss them off that could then come back and rat them out instead of defending these people and then they believe the Patriots are on their side. If you have someone that knows you did something wrong and they work for you would you then fire them in the middle of that investigation or would you make sure that they don't talk buy keeping them on payroll and if the NFL suspends them you fight for them to keep their job! Firing them is more proof logically that thy are innocent!
I wish we had some cornerbacks this year because if We did we would kill everybody this year I still hope we just kill everybody and shut everybody up I am concerned about those cornerbacks
RANT OVER I'll go back to reading only
