- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 6,039
- Reaction score
- 4,157
Exactly. They don't know the rules. That's what it means.
'surviving the ground' can apply to runners, see the famous ASJ play from the Jets game
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Exactly. They don't know the rules. That's what it means.
I believe this to be true as well, which is unfortunate for us because I bet they would have stuck with the initial 'down by contact' but feared they changed to 'fumble' knowing that a change of possession would automatically draw replay scrutiny.
We obviously won the game either way, but very interesting circumstances with this play.
it's not...Was his left knee down when he had the ball possessed against this leg with his hand or not?
it's not...Was his left knee down when he had the ball possessed against this leg with his hand or not?
Umm, but it's 100% clear he had the ball, his knee came down, and only then did Jack strip it.
The replay showed this after the game camera sort of blocked the audience with what happened.
So, trolls and loser fanbases were not only willing to see us cheated, but doubled down, claiming the refs robbed the Jags of a TD.
Absolutely unreal.
He had the ball pinned against his leg as he fell (therefore in possession) - FACT
The ball popped out upon his back slamming the ground (therefore down by contact) - FACT
The ball was then scooped up by Jax and blown dead by the official who had correctly observed facts 1 and 2 above. This isn’t the catch rule kids.
End of conversation, no debate needed.
Im still not 100% either way but I thought itd be very tough to overturn that and say he regained possession. Has perreira or anyone more knowledgeable on the matter chimed in??
I need to make sure I understand you before I take you to school:Umm, but it's 100% clear he had the ball, his knee came down, and only then did Jack strip it.
The replay showed this after the game camera sort of blocked the audience with what happened.
So, trolls and loser fanbases were not only willing to see us cheated, but doubled down, claiming the refs robbed the Jags of a TD.
Absolutely unreal.
'surviving the ground' can apply to runners, see the famous ASJ play from the Jets game
He was a pass receiver as well, but he hadn't posssessed it yet, due to the juggling of it.
If he hadn't possessed it yet then it would have been ruled incomplete.
The only way it could be ruled a fumble is if he was a runner, hence my original comment.
Some of us are blind.Thank you.
Some of us know the game, some of us apparently don't.
Exactly ... but the debate would have been huge as the meme out there is Patriots get all the calls.They would have stayed with the call either way.
Once a player becomes a runner there is no surviving the ground because there is no way a ball can be ruled incomplete. That’s why that aspect is totally irrelevant in this case.