BradyToAmendola
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,068
- Reaction score
- 148
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Supafly, I live in the Wash DC area...and must contend with Redskin, Raven, Steeler, and even Eagle fans. Think about it...you already know what the last 3 think about us. And the Redskins thought we ran up the score on them last year.
I live across the river. It's been pretty bad, usually I listen to WIP for laughs but I haven't even dared to turn it on since all this **** overflowed. Philly is by far and away a football town- all other sports are periphery- so everyone here is still hurt over Superbowl 39. I'm pretty sure they're convinced the Patriots stomach-pumped McNabb or something and that's why he got sick. Philly Sportsfans are the definition of 'insecure', so really no mystery here.I live outside Philly too and it is the worst on Boston Sports fans especially the Pats for some reason.
I get the Celtics and Bruins but the Pats hate borders on psychotic.
So maybe weather affected the balls and the Colts had theirs overinflated?
Agreed. They aren't going to suddenly stand up and cry "we were wrong all along and just stood back and watched it unfold."
They are going to at least fine them for playing with the underinflated balls one way or another in my opinion. The current investigation is about something much, much more. It's about all out cheating and trying to catch someone physically tampering with the football.
Once they aren't able to prove that, they'll simply go back to the original problem and address that. It's a lose-lose for Patriot fans.
How the hell could there even be an investigation then?
What would they compare the pressure to?
I just couldn't understand how the NFL would ever come close to admitting this, particularly at this point.
They could've/should've admitted this--if true, way back in the beginning. No one in the world would've given a damn if the refs claimed that they just squeezed the balls to check. Now they are in way too deep...forensic investigators, etc.
You can bet your ass they will want to know what the pressure was prior to the game. It's going to likely be the very first question.
Why would the league run a sting. If they knew beforehand, why didn't they just call the Pats and say we hear you may be playing with underinflated balls and if you are, you better stop? Who wants to bust people? It's just about ensuring the rules are enforced. A sting just creates a big scandal.
An appeal to whom?If we get punished just because the balls were under at the half and they can't prove we did it intentionally during the game we'd win an appeal in record time. ...
Adam Schefter on Michael Kay: "The NFL is having a hard time implicating anyone in this, any fall guy. I don't know if they will ever find someone responsible. Therefore, the NFL might just decide to fine the Patriots as an organization without any proof of any wrongdoing."
If that happens, I'd be livid.
Yes, they're used in practice all week to get broken in and scuffed.how old are the game balls? I've heard they are scuffed up, ect..but have they been used in practice at all. How "new" must they be?
I don't know, I don't know of any rule other than the refs approve them. I think there's an assumption that the team goes out and buys 24 balls every game and "breaks them in." Not sure if that's true.how old are the game balls? I've heard they are scuffed up, ect..but have they been used in practice at all. How "new" must they be?
But it's technically not illegal to play with under inflated balls.