Not surprised with Tryon. I think had he played this year he would have been considered a first round talent. He reminds me of a more athletic chandler jones. I think stokes was a little bit of a reach.
Turner and Stokes were both guys I had in mind for 46. Not a huge surprise if they went 20 picks earlier. Maybe they couldn't get trade partners. Or maybe they were graded higher than I had them (1st/2nd, but is that really too far off?).
Always hard to define a reach. Once you get past the top 10-15 players, sometimes there isn't a heck of a lot of difference between 16 and 46. Whatever you need you take.
Don’t know how you pass on Sewell. Bungles will regret that one. I know there’s some tackles still left but you don’t pass on a guy whose a generational talent.
Always hard to define a reach. Once you get past the top 10-15 players, sometimes there isn't a heck of a lot of difference between 16 and 46. Whatever you need you take.
Agree. It is a matter of a player's evaluation. Personally Bateman or Elijah Moore seem to be more attractive picks. However like you said it depends on needs.
Turner and Stokes were both guys I had in mind for 46. Not a huge surprise if they went 20 picks earlier. Maybe they couldn't get trade partners. Or maybe they were graded higher than I had them (1st/2nd, but is that really too far off?).
Based on NFL Draft Scout, the NFL Draft Bible and the NFL Draft Guide "the beast" Turner and Stokes were both late 2/early 3rd round. So to see them taken in the 1st is a surprise. I'm not saying "reach" just a surprise.