By the numbers: Patricia's offense downright offensive

[Lagaffe_07]

That includes all 3 seasons. What's deceiving about it? It's pretty straight forward, unless the defense held the opponent to 17 points, they had a 0.143 winning %. To your point, those blow-outs last season are what raised the avg per game. They averaged 27.2 ppg but they only had 5 scores higher than 27 and 12 scores lower. Both the median and mode were 25.0 ppg which would've put them at #14.

They average like 22.5 pts/game if you remove the 3 blowouts. not that great.

Mac in the non blow out games is:

14G 14 TD 13 INT 87.1 RTG

Not that great either. It shows you how people impression of the offense with Josh last year was skewed by those 3 blowouts

 

[venecol]

They average like 22.5 pts/game if you remove the 3 blowouts. not that great.

Mac in the non blow out games is:

14G 14 TD 13 INT 87.1 RTG

Not that great either. It shows you how people impression of the offense with Josh last year was skewed by those 3 blowouts

Agree, but you can't remove the 40/50-burger games because they happened. What you can do is look at the entire set of scores with more context than just using the average. Both the mode/median values of that set is 25 which is more indicative of the central tendency of the values. Now you drop from a suspect #6 offense to a more credible #14.

It's like if you have this series of numbers: 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100.

Is this a 19 ppg team? (Average)
Or a 10 ppg team? (median/mode)

All are correct but it's a f*cking 10 ppg team that blew someone out once.

 

[patsfanfromoversea]

Agree, but you can't remove the 40/50-burger games because they happened. What you can do is look at the entire set of scores with more context than just using the average. Both the mode/median values of that set is 25 which is more indicative of the central tendency of the values. Now you drop from a suspect #6 offense to a more credible #14.

It's like if you have this series of numbers: 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100.

Is this a 19 ppg team? (Average)
Or a 10 ppg team? (median/mode)

All are correct but it's a f*cking 10 ppg team that blew someone out once.

Not according to ring6

 

[Lagaffe_07]

Agree, but you can't remove the 40/50-burger games because they happened. What you can do is look at the entire set of scores with more context than just using the average. Both the mode/median values of that set is 25 which is more indicative of the central tendency of the values. Now you drop from a suspect #6 offense to a more credible #14.

It's like if you have this series of numbers: 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100.

Is this a 19 ppg team? (Average)
Or a 10 ppg team? (median/mode)

All are correct but it's a f*cking 10 ppg team that blew someone out once.

I agree you can’t but it was just to illustrate how stats are misleading. 17% of the season are overshadowing the other 83%.

Those 3 blowouts are not indicative of what the season was. And most people around here use that to make the point that the offense and Mac were good last year when in fact, even with Josh, it’s wasn’t really the case and it was closer to below average.

The offense was carried by a good running game and a really good defense until the defense stunk at the end. If the offense was really that good last year, they should have been able to overcome some of the bad performances from the defense.

 

[Rob0729]

That includes all 3 seasons. What's deceiving about it? It's pretty straight forward, unless the defense held the opponent to 17 points, they had a 0.143 winning %. To your point, those blow-outs last season are what raised the avg per game. They averaged 27.2 ppg but they only had 5 scores higher than 27 and 12 scores lower. Both the median and mode were 25.0 ppg which would've put them at #14.

I am talking about Including the non-Patricia years. Last year was not an issue.

 

[goheels22002]

Agree, but you can't remove the 40/50-burger games because they happened. What you can do is look at the entire set of scores with more context than just using the average. Both the mode/median values of that set is 25 which is more indicative of the central tendency of the values. Now you drop from a suspect #6 offense to a more credible #14.

It's like if you have this series of numbers: 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100.

Is this a 19 ppg team? (Average)
Or a 10 ppg team? (median/mode)

All are correct but it's a f*cking 10 ppg team that blew someone out once.

This is hugely helpful for the predict the score contest. 19 is the new 30.

 

[thecore762]

Patricia has to go.

 

[PatsfanTN]

Patricia has to go.

Is this even a question?

 

[FlyingEagle2]

Is this even a question?

Pretty sure it's all but done, at this point. The experiment of putting him in charge of the offense was a colossal failure.

 

[State]

When the clown show opened up in preseason and we were going to become a finesse, outside zone blocking scheme with several lumbering gap power blockers, I was curious. I like watching people try to put square pegs in round holes. And each preseason game the offense didn’t improve.

If anything, it got worse. Remember the one against the Raiders?

This should be a fireable offense of the man who orchestrated it. Bill Belichick.

 

[captain stone]

Corky needs competition too.

Neither of these f ucking stiffs bring out the best in each other.

 

[Deus Irae]

Patricia has to go.

Get Patricia away from the offense (Let him be either Ernie Adams or some other form of special assistant)
Get Judge back to special teams
Bring back the old offense, perhaps with O'Brien as the OC


Just those 3 coaching changes would probably have been good for 3-4 wins this season, despite some obvious player personnel issues.