Wheelman
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
- Messages
- 10,760
- Reaction score
- 11,411
I swear, if unemployed adult children were banned from living in their adult parents' basements, the whole Internet would be so much better.
Don't count on it! lol
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I swear, if unemployed adult children were banned from living in their adult parents' basements, the whole Internet would be so much better.
Did a quick look at the penalties...
#15 Holding... yep got away with one but it would have been declined.
But, see this is what I am talking about...For those of you who live outside of NE like me, you know how annoying this is, and how wildly uncomfortable it is, too.
But, for those of you still in that NE bubble, who have no friends outside of NE, this mental illness these fans show, is probably hard to feel the full appreciation for.
Throw in a cheerleader Romo, ESPN/Felger-Mazz style brainwashing, etc, and this is what happens. People get brainwashed and see what they want to see.
Agree. I live in DC. The only thing that softens it here is that there is so much despair and mallaise about the local team that people just don't have the energy to whine about the Pats. But just up the road in B'more...
And yet it is still completely within our control as individuals as to how much we choose to let it bother us.
I don't agree with you about Romo. He's just new and enthusiastic about this job, but he isn't slanted one way or the other.
On the delay of game, there’s clearly a whistle while the ball is still in the air. There’s no flag visible on the broadcast, and I don’t think that play was included in the coaches film but the play finder is a disaster so I’m not completely sure.
Did a quick look at the penalties...
#15 Holding... yep got away with one but it would have been declined.
#77 Holding... not really. I can see why someone may think so but it is more the rush path used.
#69 Tripping.. no he fell. He never actually got to his legs
#71 Holding... no. Once you trip and rush in sideways from the interior you need to accept a hand on your front and back.
#71 Holding... no. He spun around and then was pushed forward.
#77 Illegal Contact. Was to the high shoulder. The hand being pushed away after makes it seem higher and more inside.
#23 Holding. No. There was hand fighting but not really holding. They let that go every play.
#25. Holding. Yeah I'd say that was holding. It would have been declined though.
#25 Holding. Nah. The release happened without 5 yards so I think that was a good non-call. They let them play without 5 yards all day.
#91 Neutral Zone. It be super ticky tac but maybe.
So after looking through the number of plays brought up I'd say 2-3 have legit concerns. Of course the Jags got away with some too. It happens.
Or the DPI on HoganI was about to type almost exactly the same impressions as this. Almost everything the guy calls "obvious" wasn't even a penalty.
And not one of those examples was as clear as the DPI that wasn't called against the Jags on Cooks deep down the field.
These people are truly pathetic.
They had a 20-10 lead in the 4th quarter. Whatever the discrepancy was in penalties, they were in absolute prime position to win the game. It's simple why all of these teams lose to the Patriots despite arguably outplaying them and/or winning the turnover battle. They get fewer "scoring possessions." That is, they purposefully use possessions to "run out the clock" or "play it safe" rather than just trying to move the ball and score points.
On every possession, the Patriots tried to score a touchdown.
Jacksonville did the following:
There is a really bad idea in the NFL that has gone on for years, and it consists of this: control the clock and time of possession, keep the ball out of Brady's hands, and when you have the lead, kill as much clock as you can. What it really does is limits your playbook and your team no longer tries to exploit the Patriots weaknesses. At the end of the game, you realize that there was always going to be plenty of clock left, and the Patriots used their possessions wisely, whereas you wasted some. The Falcons had a good strategy in SB51, but it just didn't work. They kept their foot on the pedal, which is exactly what they should have done. It was just poor execution. The simple point is that when you play Brady, he is going to score his points, and you need to score yours, or you will lose. It's as simple as the scoreboard.
- After their delay of game penalty before the half, they could have still had a first down, but went with a safe play, thinking it would be safer to punt.
- After receiving the ball at the end of the first half with two timeouts left, they knelt on it, being "satisfied" with a 14-10 lead.
- In the fourth quarter, their play calling became very unaggressive, as they tried to run the ball or take safe completions short of the first down marker. In particular, the third down before the Patriots game winning TD drive, was a pretty pitiful attempt at a first down. The Patriots wanted them to throw short of the marker, and McCourty made an easy tackle.
There is an interesting study done on this. People enjoy - and I mean genuinely enjoy - the feeling of being outraged about something. They get a dopamine rush from complaining about how they got screwed one way of another.
Or the DPI on Hogan
| 13 | 439 |
| 41 | 2K |
| 63 | 4K |
| 176 | 21K |
| 10 | 915 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)











