Exactly where in that "full text" did he say he made a mistake caving?
I think that came earlier, when the league said "thanks for playing ball Bob, now we're stealing all your draft picks and suspending your quarterback." I remember words to the effect of "I put my faith in the league's process and realize now that was a mistake."
I don't remember whether I participated in Kraft-hate here. When he made his "best for the 32" remarks he inalterably screwed himself with a great number of fans.
He's stated strongly enough that this has been a witch-hunt - he reiterates repeatedly that the science is against the league in this statement - that if I was ever in the hate camp I personally have backed off it.
He might sound whiny, but the substance of his statement is today's equivalent of Al Davis - minus the "moving the team whether you like it or not" stuff.
Saying that off the cuff and not in the middle of the statement, likely just to local media means that it isn't really that important to him and won't get any national play.
Perfect world: He
could have immediately sued for defamation and fought the stolen draft picks from day 1.
Real world: If you were at all on the fence about Kraft, this statement is a mild positive. It's forceful in its repetition that there was no crime in the first place, in combination with the statement that Goodell does not have the right to take the actions he took.
If you formed your opinions once and for all time when he met w/Goodell behind closed doors and caved? Ain't nothin' bringing you back.
My read is that he simply showed the bedrock of his position: Yeah he's a fan sure. Hey maybe he bleeds Patriots blue and silver and red and white and whatnot on gameday, but for Christ's sake, he's a businessman. Six days a week and all offseason he bleeds green, period.
You guys want a fan, there's one next to you on every barstool. Don't look to an owner to be a fan, not like you're thinking of, that's not their game. They're fans
after they're owners. Except maybe Dan Snyder, who thinks his team is a fantasy football team. And he's probably more "casual" a fan than Kraft.
Question is, do you think he's a bad owner or a bad fan?
I think he's a good owner who made a mistake. His franchise took too much damage; in retrospect - playing counterfactuals here - there might/might not have been ways to win the whole ball of wax. I am not sure what they are.
The underlying problem is that the league ceded Goodell the option to essentially cheat -- to determine penalties, make up new infractions, pass summary judgment without any factual basis, etc.
The owners voted him the right to be the "new sheriff in town," because the league kept having murderers and rapists as players. The theory was he was going to kick butt and take names in terms of image, and everybody would get rich. (All owners that is)
Well the league
did get richer under Goodell. Hell, maybe it would get even richer under Vince McMahon.
So I'm not hatin' the player, I'm hatin' the game. The underlying problem, in my opinion, is a threat to the sport's credibility. It's okay when it's just us, or just the Saints, or just somebody else... while his favorites skate on arguably worse offenses.
I don't know how far it goes before it all snaps. Who knows, maybe this is what makes the NFL a marketable commodity. Cheating, so that the best team doesn't do too well.
And yeah I will STILL be excited even for the first four games. It's Patriots football. They haven't taken that away... yet.
And I'll be especially psyched to see how pissed off Brady is after 4 games holding a clipboard