Bring on the dislikes.
I loved Danny Woodhead, but I don't understand the people whining about him leaving.
He has been injury-prone in San Diego. When he's been healthy, his average stats have been down, his volume stats up due to usage. His yards per carry and yards per catch are below even his averages with the Jets.
He played in 46 of 47 possible regular season games with the Patriots, but only 37 of 64 with the Chargers. Then look at his numbers in his 2 healthy seasons in San Diego. Breakdowns include his average in his time in New England/his 2013 season in San Diego/his 2015 season in San Diego/his overall San Diego numbers
Yards per rush: 4.8/4.0/3.4/3.9
Yards per catch: 10.7/8.0/9.4/8.6
He's averaged 63.6 yards per game since he joined the Chargers. Vereen averaged 61.4 yards per game in the 2 seasons after Woody left, with better per carry/catch averages (4.3 per carry, 8.8 per catch).
Woody also averaged 3.4 per rush and 9.4 per catch in the playoffs for us, under 39 yards per game.
Someone mentioned how Woody would convert 3rd and longs, but when I took a look, I don't see it. From 2011 to 2016, I looked at 3rd and 8+ yards. Woody had 14 targets, 7 receptions, 3 1st downs. He had 2 1st downs on 4 rushing attempts. So maybe that's what we remember. Those 5 1st downs on 18 plays is a pretty good percentage, but hardly enough to really be that big of an impact. By comparison, Vereen had 5 1st downs passing in 15 targets, and 3 1st downs rushing on 5 attempts, for 8 1st downs on 20 plays.
Woody was a good player, and he had a great first season with us, fell off a bit, but had a nice 2012. But it's not like the offense fell off a cliff because Woody left. We kept chugging along, even winning a Super Bowl. Woody had a good first season, then got injured and missed most of the 2014 year. He struggled to run the ball in 2015 but was a solid pass catching threat, then missed most of 2016.
So I liked him, glad we had him, wish we had re-signed him, but his loss seems very over-rated by many here.