PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Belichick to ESPN this morning: "We will not trade Graham this year. End of story."

Status
Not open for further replies.
spacecrime said:
Re-read the article:

"We have not had a single discussion about trading Daniel Graham," Belichick told ESPN.com Thursday morning.

Replying to an offer, even in the negative, is still discussing it. Just ask Ty law and the Postons

Actually, re-read the Herald article, as I think that's what he was referencing:

http://patriots.bostonherald.com/patriots/view.bg?articleid=143808

"According to a league source, the Broncos approached the Patriots with such a proposal, but the Pats said no thanks."
 
JoeSixPat said:
Actually, re-read the Herald article, as I think that's what he was referencing:

http://patriots.bostonherald.com/patriots/view.bg?articleid=143808
Ha ha ha. On one hand I have a direct quote by Bill Belichick that there were no discussions. On the other hand, the Herald uses one of their famous unnamed sources to say Belichick did have a discussion.

Now, let's see. Which one am I going to believe?
 
spacecrime said:
Ha ha ha. On one hand I have a direct quote by Bill Belichick that there were no discussions. On the other hand, the Herald uses one of their famous unnamed sources to say Belichick did have a discussion.

Now, let's see. Which one am I going to believe?
Belichick may consider "no thanks" to be a response but not a discussion
 
I think BB's public statement of no trade for Lelie also sent a message of other
sorts.?

DG is here for '06 and DB will be our #1 WR this season.

Building team chemistry takes on many looks.??
 
This Year means This Year

I think BB says "this year" for obvious reasons...

1, 1.5% of what he said: next year they gotta talk turkey, for starters, given Graham's contract. Not bad for Graham to get a little nudge toward the well-known "contract year effect." You get to motivate without even talkin' to the guy.

2, .5% of what he said: in (1) above, BB is defining the landscape to the potential FA - we could trade you, effectively selling the rights to negotiate your new deal, unless we view you as indispensable. It's cheaper to trade these days... bear in mind, that option will be on the table.

3, or 98% of what BB said: We're not trading him so shut the %#@$% up about it already.

PFnV
 
The idea that we would be looking to trade Graham is far-fetched in the first place. I'm convinced some draftnik who doesn't follow the Pats saw BB land two rookie TEs at a position where we already have two good ones and concluded that we were looking to make a change. Wrong. That's just BB building out his depth chart. Same reason he drafted an elite RB with a great RB already on the roster.

The only thing more ridiculous is the idea that the Pats would do it for Leslie. One of the papers called him a "one trick pony"-- which is appropriate-- and you could hardly come up with a more damning phrase for a Belichick receiver.

I never believed it. If the rumors had been about Ed Reed, Eric Moulds or someone who seem fits the Pats profile more closely... well, then I might have thought about it a little differently.
 
spacecrime said:
Ha ha ha. On one hand I have a direct quote by Bill Belichick that there were no discussions. On the other hand, the Herald uses one of their famous unnamed sources to say Belichick did have a discussion.

Now, let's see. Which one am I going to believe?




Yes... you can take everything BB says literally... he'd never make a statement stretching the truth if he felt it could help his team.

BB's famous for that degree of honesty with the media - especially his injury reports!

You're too funny!

I think my original feeling about this rumor was probably the correct one. The Broncos want to trade Lelie. Lelie's been on the market since draft day. No one has been interested. People have forgotten about Lelie.

The Broncos started this trade rumor with the Denver Post to get Lelie's name in the headlines again, and make other GMs think there was some degree of interest in him... and that a team like the Patriots would actually see enough value in Lelie to offer a player AND a draft pick.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by One-If-By-Sea
4d
📰 Article
youtube.com
Uncategorized
youtube.com · by Clonamery
6d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Schefter on Giants Offer For Cam Ward
twitter.com · by Uptown
13d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @NFL on X: Drake Maye No. 11 on the NFL Top 100 of 2026
Patriots Videos
x.com · by Ian
15d
REISS: How will the Patriots respond in 2026 to the Super Bowl loss?
Interesting Article (Sports)
espn.com · by Ian
16d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: 2026 Patriots Day 1 Joint Practice - Patriots INTs
Patriots News
twitter.com · by Ian
17d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @Brewers on X: 22 Runs During a Wild Night
Video
x.com · by Ian
17d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Watching Tom Brady Tear Through the Playoffs at Age 41
Patriots Videos
twitter.com · by Uptown
20d
MORSE: Comparing the 2025 Roster to This Year’s Roster
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 9/3
MORSE: Patriots Busy Adding to 53-Man Roster and Practice Squad
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Press Conference 9/1
MORSE: Patriots Roster Remains in Flux
Breaking Down the Patriots’ 2026 Initial 53-Man Roster
MORSE: Some Hits and Misses on Patriots’ Initial 53-Man Roster
Patriots News And Notes 08-30: The Depth Will Be An Issue
MORSE: Patriots Final 53-Man Roster Projection
MORSE: Good, Bad, and Ugly as Patriots Embarrass Themselves in 37-13 loss to Browns
Back
Top