MrBigglesWorth
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 9,930
- Reaction score
- 1,632
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Tom brady without bb is drew brees or peyton manning
Yup Brees one won tooDid last season happen or was it a dream?
Yup Brees one won too
I get it... Youre a brady fan... Separately they're not winning 6 titles... Probably not even 31 for 20 is really the same as 1 for 1?
I agree, we need to let it play out a few years since the team Bill put out last year was utter crap.2000 and 2020 were rebuilds, if you cannot see what went into those years not sure what else i can tell you. When dynasty v1 hit its end in 2009 we had a team that in most cases would be 7-9ish but having brady here to drag their carcus to the wild card round was really the only difference between that year and 2020. If brady was here in 2020, maybe we win 10 games and get booted early again.
It takes years to build a team back up to contender status in this league once the window has closed. Bb might get them back to contender status, hopefully even win one without tom like tom got one without him. The 2 being together obviously lead to 3 titles in a short span on multiple occasions, and most likely cannot do that without each other. You have to let it play out a few years.
I agree, we need to let it play out a few years since the team Bill put out last year was utter crap.
This year, it's better, we just don't know how much yet. So far, "winning the off-season" isn't panning out, since there's no evidence we have the best OL, deepest RB group, or made enough moves to stop the run. These next two games against better teams should give us better answers of what this team really is.
Lame take. Exceedingly lame.So no coach could have succeeded with 2000 team or the first two games of 2001....and then they could until 2020 then they couldnt....No no has nothing to do with Brady...So how do you think the next few years will shake out? 3 superbowls? Because then we could compare.
Let's get this straight. Lombardi took a Redskins team that was 5-9 in 1968 and improved them to 7-5-2 in 1969. He coached one season with the Skins and then he died. Time to rename the trophy because he didn't win the Super Bowl at the end of a one year rebuild?Vince Lombardi didn't win with the redskins after he left the packers. Time to rename the trophy. The whole argument of BB vs Tom is talk radio verbal diarrhea. .news flash. Coaches need good plays to win. Like, QBs need a good team around them to win. Shocking I know.
let's get this straight. I was being sarcastic.Let's get this straight. Lombardi took a Redskins team that was 5-9 in 1968 and improved them to 7-5-2 in 1969. He coached one season with the Skins and then he died. Time to rename the trophy because he didn't win the Super Bowl at the end of a one year rebuild?
This is not correct at all. Cam entire contract wasn't guaranteed, folk is playing. How can he be dead cap money, etcNot independently verified, lol.
View attachment 35563
Tampa has been verify disciplined in limiting dead money which is why they had the room to structure some of the deals they made (not a cap guru at all, just what I've been reading).
If he was he head coach if Greenbay, he probably would have beat TBBill's 62-73, 1-1 in the playoffs, as a HC without Brady. Counting Tuna Crap's wins doesn't count unless you want to count all of Bill's losses as an assistant during his career.
Even if you do count those Giant wins that defense was loaded with great players, which is what all coaches need to be successful. That's the point.
Do you think Bill would have beaten TB last year if he was the HC of the Falcons? Me neither.
Cam’s salary was guaranteed plus his signing bonus. There were incentives which went away with his release.This is not correct at all. Cam entire contract wasn't guaranteed, folk is playing. How can he be dead cap money, etc
Tom Brady without BB quite possibly never plays a down in the NFL. And if he gets a chance, it's on a short leash, and if he's on a lesser team than those early Patriots, he's probably a journeyman.Tom brady without bb is drew brees or peyton manning.... BB without brady is Andy Reid or shanahan
Depends.If Peyton Manning was coached by Belichick and Brady was coached by Tony Dungy in the 2000s which QB would have won the most Super Bowls?
Take it up with OTC.This is not correct at all. Cam entire contract wasn't guaranteed, folk is playing. How can he be dead cap money, etc
Here is an interesting take on BB the coach. What if BB coached the other team in all the Super Bowls the Patriots were in. Atlanta, LA, St. Louis, Seattle were distinct wins.I’ve decided to go media silent next week as the Brady vs. Belichick jabber will be insufferable. Neither man has anything to prove.
As I’ve posted earlier, Bill Belichick had two SB rings and a game plan in the HOF before Tom Brady started high school. Super Bowl championships without the other: Belichick 2 Brady 1. If BB had been HC of the Packers last season, the tally would be 3 to 0.
Hell, I’m not even Bill’s biggest fan. I’ve criticized him many times on this board, but this whole narrative that Bill Belichick 7 months shy of his 70th birthday has to win another SB without Brady or be thought of as just another coach is utter nonsense.
Ask yourself this. If Peyton Manning was coached by Belichick and Brady was coached by Tony Dungy in the 2000s which QB would have won the most Super Bowls?