- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 33,626
- Reaction score
- 19,462
This is based on a post on the Patriots cuts thread:
Strictly speaking, a player's salary is guaranteed ONLY IF his contract specifically does so.
The "guarantee" that is mentioned here is actually from what's called the "Termination Pay" clause. That clause says that if a player:
(1) Would be an unrestricted FA if released;
(2) Is on a 53-man roster for the first game of the season;
and
(3) Is released in the middle of the season,
then
ONCE in his career, he can collect the remainder of his salary for that season.
So, for example, if Fells were on the roster Week 1 and then cut, he would be eligible for the termination pay. Hoomanawanui, however, is not eligible, since he would not be an unrestricted FA if released.
If they cut him they no longer have to guarantee his 2013 salary correct?
Strictly speaking, a player's salary is guaranteed ONLY IF his contract specifically does so.
The "guarantee" that is mentioned here is actually from what's called the "Termination Pay" clause. That clause says that if a player:
(1) Would be an unrestricted FA if released;
(2) Is on a 53-man roster for the first game of the season;
and
(3) Is released in the middle of the season,
then
ONCE in his career, he can collect the remainder of his salary for that season.
So, for example, if Fells were on the roster Week 1 and then cut, he would be eligible for the termination pay. Hoomanawanui, however, is not eligible, since he would not be an unrestricted FA if released.











