- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 14,108
- Reaction score
- 5,706
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Dorito dink missing from practice would be cause for concern on this board.When Patterson being missing is a cause for panic that’s when you know your roster is f.ucked.
need to let it play out first. If we win the next two 11-5, 10th straight division title.. etc. I expect re-tooling all the time, and they need to do a better job of it that is for sure..This is the last year of Patriots Dynasty 2.0. It's 2009 again, not in the sense of the teams results but in terms of an aging roster and a series of disappointing drafts. In 2010, it was said they made some big reevaluation of their scouting department and the types of players they were drafting. I think another reevaluation would make sense here.
This is the last year of Patriots Dynasty 2.0. It's 2009 again, not in the sense of the teams results but in terms of an aging roster and a series of disappointing drafts. In 2010, it was said they made some big reevaluation of their scouting department and the types of players they were drafting. I think another reevaluation would make sense here.
The entire stretch will be considered the same dynasty historically. mainly because of the continuous Division titles, winning seasons, Super Bowl appearances, and the continuity of the QB and Coach. (San Fran is considered one dynasty and they changed coach and QB.)I think the Patriots dynasty has had a bunch of different iterations already. It's a rough exercise at best, but I'd say that 2001-2006 was roughly one iteration, 2007-2011 was roughly one, 2012-2015 was roughly one, and 2016-2018 was roughly one. I agree that 2018 feels like the end of an iteration, and next year's team will look significantly different.
The entire stretch will be considered the same dynasty historically. mainly because of the continuous Division titles, winning seasons, Super Bowl appearances, and the continuity of the QB and Coach. (San Fran is considered one dynasty and they changed coach and QB.)
The 1957 Celtics had one player that was on the 1969 Celtics (at least I am pretty sure that's true) , and a different Head Coach.. no one considers that separate dynasties.
Welcome to the Sony Michel era!
Everybody can breathe, I was thereThe Dorito dink missing from practice would be cause for concern on this board.