- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 28,161
- Reaction score
- 7,435
This blatantly false.
it is but only because they aren't targeted 170 times in a season
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This blatantly false.
(Using Stats LLC drops stat)it is but only because they aren't targeted 170 times in a season
Hmm, didn't notice that. Doesn't really matter though, because as much as people act like Lloyd is useless, the Pats aren't finding another 900 yard receiver for the $2.5M they'd save if they were to cut him, assuming it's not guaranteed.Question...is Lloyd's 2013 $3mill option bonus guaranteed?
from Rotoworld: "3/17/12: Signed a three-year, $12 million contract. The deal included a $3 million signing bonus. Annual $100,000 workout bonuses are available throughout the contract's life. 2013: $1.9 million (+ $3 million option bonus), 2014: $2.9 million, 2015:
(Using Stats LLC drops stat)
Welker: 10 drops, 118 receptions; 10/128=7.8% of catchable balls dropped
Edelman: 1 drop, 21 receptions; 1/22=4.5%
Amendola: 1 drop, 63 receptions; 1/64=1.6%
if edelman has 118 recs next year..he will be around 10 drops as well
I would be stunned if Welker does better than 3/15m.
To clarify, I don't think he'll get more than that here. He may very well get more elsewhere.
Based on the small sample size, I wouldn't say that's overly unrealistic. Amendola, on the other hand, caught half as many balls with 1/10 the drops. No way anybody can say that he drops more balls than Welker.if edelman has 118 recs next year..he will be around 10 drops as well
Based on the small sample size, I wouldn't say that's overly unrealistic. Amendola, on the other hand, caught half as many balls with 1/10 the drops. No way anybody can say that he drops more balls than Welker.
There's a difference. The Rams offense was significantly better with Amendola and he has become Bradford's go to guy.