- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 2,381
- Reaction score
- 3,486
The Globe has a good read as to how the team adjusted WITHOUT Tatum and a lot of things remained the same so it may not even be much of an adjustment - more just about letting him work up the minutes.
What has changed is the Celts were third in post-ups last season; now they’re 28th.
I think that's obviously because of the loss of Porzingas and Vooch's offense seems to be a better match to that than Queta, although I love how that kid is developing.
So the main way. see them adjusting is by working in more of the post op which often seemed to be Tatum throwing it in to Porzingas (and Porzingas either taking the shot or kicking it back out to Tatum for the open 3)
So aside from just letting his minutes creep up as he conditions for the playoffs, that's the added dimension for the playoffs that I think we need.
How have the Celtics changed without Jayson Tatum in the lineup this season? - The Boston Globe
Tatum was the team’s scoring leader (26.8 points per game), rebounding leader (8.7), and assists leader (6). He took — and made — the most shots, and no one got to the free throwline more.www.bostonglobe.com
Still crazy to me that Stevens has them under the luxury tax but we STILL have Tatum, Brown, White, and Pritchard and a bunch of young cheap guys who are stepping up and could well be contenders.
What I get from this analysis is this: "They ratcheted up their drives from 36.8 per game last season to 46.9 this season, and dialed up pick-and-rolls from 16.8 to 20.4.". To me, that is where the post-up shots went.











