Because he isn’t special.
800 yard WRs who struggle with yac and getting in the end zone are not special.
Especially ones that give away a game with a stupid lateral.
The question is whether it was strategic, ie, overpaying one player costs you others, and if that guy fails it strangles your cap. Or whether it was the best way to stay under a restrictive budget.
It’s not a matter of spending to the cap, they have always done that. But it’s the overall contracts.
You can sign a guy to 2 years and 12 mill and have him count 6 mill against cap or you can sign a guy to 6 years 80 mill with a 30 mill SB and count 6 mill against the cap.
What we are going...
I don’t think anyone would disagree with that but that’s a far different attitude than “you must take the qb and keep doing it until you get a good one”
Hiring someone as a lb coach after they played lb for you and hiring the least experienced coach to ever be hired in the NFL (that I can tell at least) are 2 very different things.
I have yet to hear anything of substance. And we all should be in wait and see mode.
You are entitled to your opinion.
I will never believe that when you disagree with a statement and then repeat it as your own a few days later, that it’s anything but backtracking. But you don’t need to feel that way.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.