- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Its unlikely that they will assign anyone to 91 unless absolutely necessary, out of respect for Marquise Hill.
This year, maybe. But anything beyond this year, no. That's essentially retiring it.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Its unlikely that they will assign anyone to 91 unless absolutely necessary, out of respect for Marquise Hill.
This year, maybe. But anything beyond this year, no. That's essentially retiring it.
Mayo should wear #55, so we can call him Cinco Cinco de Mayo.
Hey, some refs have had three digit numbers for years. How about allowing 100-199 (hopefully that 1 won't get too cramped). So far as determing what 100+ numbers are valid for what positions, just ignore the leading 1. Linebackers can be 50-59 or they can be 150-159. This will even work for the teens... 19 becomes 9, 12 becomes 2, so the refs don't have to think "OK I see a leading 1 but it's a two digit number..." just simply drop any leading 1.yeash, the need some more numbers.
Slaughter is gone, so I say he will be 51...
That's good!Mayo should wear #55, so we can call him Cinco Cinco de Mayo.
51 or 91 would both be good numbers for Mayo.
How about #98? A number in the 50's would be better but there are so many retired that it's ridiculous. I like #59 but that's taken right?
Is #56 retired (Tippet)?
I think he should take #57. Thats a good number
Why not 47?
Why not 47?
Thats a collage #. whats up with #51?Why not 47?
Because he can't wear it in the regular season.
| 17 | 780 |
| 28 | 3K |
| 17 | 1K |
| 54 | 4K |
| 17 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











