OT: [GreenCow is losing it] I think i’m onto something about the NFL

[upstater1]

I'm saying this for the Patriot fans on this board, not as a response to Greencow.

Read the opening post and then consider how painful it must be to be a Bills fan, how tortured and wracked your body is, and then consider that's nothing compared to how this fandom deteriorates your mind.

 

[StockingAnarchyNumber12]

I saw him fumble the ball like he was bowling. Does Josh belong to a league up there?

Last year I watched Josh fail to pick up a 1st down rushing cs KC.

Allen is not clutch or a winner like Mahomes or Brady. Allen is Drew Bledsoe. 1 player or OC short of success so it's never his fault.

Except Brees won a Super Bowl so he isn’t even on his level

 

[Jim Plunkett]

That's not the rule.

Cooks being a receiver is not treated like a RB unless he becomes a rusher which he did not. Cooks back touching does not end the play.

A receivers catch does not end like a RB touching the ground. The ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver has possession. The Diggs TD vs Houston is a good example. The ball did not move.

Cooks lost the ball because he didn't survive the ground and the Broncos took it away.

The only thing that matters is- what does the ref decide to call at the moment. It has nothing to do with how you think the rule is written or defined or interpreted. It's given plenty of legal speak flexibility to mean what ever they want to at the time.
The ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver has possession - MEANS THE REF CAN DECIDE WHETHER HE DID OR NOT. it's lawyer talk. It has nothing to do with truth or even proof. It means we can make up **** as we go and claim the law has prevailed ( side note. I got a dang jury duty thing in the mail 2 weeks ago and luckily it wasn't my number that came up. But that's the third notice in 6 years and I've only lived here 10 years. I think I'm just ignoring them from here on in)

 

[Huckleberry1]

Josh Alllen left the field with a lead.

Again.

as he always does in the playoffs

I blame the other team and the league. They are always screwing the Bills by scoring more points than them when it really matters. They should hire Bill Pollian and get him to change the rules so that the team that has more points doesn't always win, and the team who never wins big games gets to win the Super Bowl because they have never won one and it's their turn.

 

[TommyD4207]

It’s obvious when you look at everything that has happened. Just follow the order of events…

1) Bills got screwed in the Denver game. Blatantly. Everyone saw it.

2) This created a firestorm across the NFL media and people were calling the NFL out on it.

3) The NFL realized they made it too blatant this time so they needed something to take peoples eyes off it. They make a call to Pegula and tell him to fire McDermott. Meanwhile, they (the NFL) decide make sure Patriots make SB to keep people mad about that. Dual attention grabbers to take people’s eyes off the cheating.

4) Pegula fires McDermott and Pats make SB, so eyes are drawn to the head coach search and Pats hate. But there is still a few eyes looking at the blatant cheating scandal that robbed the Bills of an AFCCG appearance.

5) NFL makes another call “we need a bigger diversion - instead of hiring one of the stud coordinators, promote Joe Brady”

Pegula makes it so and the firestorm is now on the Bills for doing this idiotic think, and the NFL gets away scott free.

You've become a meme for every Bills fan.

Jsoh Allen never loses, it's always the refs. Absolutely hysterical.

As predicted, nobody cares about the clear and obvious interception anymore - except Bills fans (because it was a clear and obvious interception to everyone but Bills fans, old people, and casuals). There is no firestorm. It was a one-day story, because of course it was, got a bunch of clicks and views for one day.

Brandin Cooks knew it was an interception on the field.

 

[TB12TheGoat]

how and why does a BUF fan have nearly 1,300 posts on a Pats message board?!

 

[bakes781]

Buffalo area code 044

O fo 4 in da big game lmao

 

[Pat the Pats Fan]

No we promoted someone who doesn’t deserve it.

OC

Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic again….

 

[Bill Lee]

Kupp didn’t take any steps after catching the ball. Zero. He caught it and immediately went down. Just like Cooks.

Kupp had control of the ball, took two steps, and made a move common to the game (stretching the ball out) before he hit the ground.

This means that when he hit the ground he had already made the catch so he was a runner, therefore the play stops when he hits the ground.

Surviving the ground is not a factor because he already completed the catch and had become a runner before he hit the ground.

 

[Triumph]

The only thing that matters is- what does the ref decide to call at the moment. It has nothing to do with how you think the rule is written or defined or interpreted. It's given plenty of legal speak flexibility to mean what ever they want to at the time.
The ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver has possession - MEANS THE REF CAN DECIDE WHETHER HE DID OR NOT. it's lawyer talk. It has nothing to do with truth or even proof. It means we can make up **** as we go and claim the law has prevailed ( side note. I got a dang jury duty thing in the mail 2 weeks ago and luckily it wasn't my number that came up. But that's the third notice in 6 years and I've only lived here 10 years. I think I'm just ignoring them from here on in)

What are you talking about?

Im not an Attorney. The video is the judge and jury on whether the receiver caught the ball or not. Surviving the ground is part of the rule to determine if the receiver completed the reception or not. If you want to claim that Cooks made the reception then have it. The play was reviewed and the ball moved and was taken away by Denver. Cooks never had sole possession.

 

[Bill Lee]

The only thing that matters is- what does the ref decide to call at the moment. It has nothing to do with how you think the rule is written or defined or interpreted. It's given plenty of legal speak flexibility to mean what ever they want to at the time.
The ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver has possession - MEANS THE REF CAN DECIDE WHETHER HE DID OR NOT. it's lawyer talk. It has nothing to do with truth or even proof. It means we can make up **** as we go and claim the law has prevailed ( side note. I got a dang jury duty thing in the mail 2 weeks ago and luckily it wasn't my number that came up. But that's the third notice in 6 years and I've only lived here 10 years. I think I'm just ignoring them from here on in)

If you believe what you wrote, then why the **** do you watch the sport?

 

[Sect140]

Josh Alllen left the field with a lead.

Again.

as he always does in the playoffs

How many turnovers did Josh have?

 

[Sect140]

No we promoted someone who doesn’t deserve it.

OC

Why aren’t you on one the Bills fans websites crying with them? You whining on this site just brings us joy.

 

[Sect140]

What are you talking about?

Im not an Attorney. The video is the judge and jury on whether the receiver caught the ball or not. Surviving the ground is part of the rule to determine if the receiver completed the reception or not. If you want to claim that Cooks made the reception then have it. The play was reviewed and the ball moved and was taken away by Denver. Cooks never had sole possession.

I thought it was ruled that he didn’t have complete possession of the ball on the way down and replays kind of shows that, the networks ref analyst even backed that up, so Green Crying Cow whining that he caught it and should’ve been ruled a catch when he landed doesn’t matter in this case because he didn’t have possession on the way to the ground.

 

[borg]

It’s obvious when you look at everything that has happened. Just follow the order of events…

1) Bills got screwed in the Denver game. Blatantly. Everyone saw it.

2) This created a firestorm across the NFL media and people were calling the NFL out on it.

3) The NFL realized they made it too blatant this time so they needed something to take peoples eyes off it. They make a call to Pegula and tell him to fire McDermott. Meanwhile, they (the NFL) decide make sure Patriots make SB to keep people mad about that. Dual attention grabbers to take people’s eyes off the cheating.

4) Pegula fires McDermott and Pats make SB, so eyes are drawn to the head coach search and Pats hate. But there is still a few eyes looking at the blatant cheating scandal that robbed the Bills of an AFCCG appearance.

5) NFL makes another call “we need a bigger diversion - instead of hiring one of the stud coordinators, promote Joe Brady”

Pegula makes it so and the firestorm is now on the Bills for doing this idiotic think, and the NFL gets away scott free.

Is your water source Love Canal?

 

[Triumph]

I thought it was ruled that he didn’t have complete possession of the ball on the way down and replays kind of shows that, the networks ref analyst even backed that up, so Green Crying Cow whining that he caught it and should’ve been ruled a catch when he landed doesn’t matter in this case because he didn’t have possession on the way to the ground.

The ball also moved after Cooks hit the ground since Denver took it away.

 

[Uptown]

 

[Bill Lee]

Is your water source Love Canal?

That, or the giant toilet bowl that is their new stadium!



h/t @Dexter

 

[Huckleberry1]

Green Cow joined in 2020, when it was obvious the Bills were on the rise and the Patriots sucked, and would suck for years to come. Now that the Bills have **** themselves and the Patriots are back on top he can't handle it and is actually blaming teams for playing their starting quarterback in playoff games against them. He's a little crybaby ***** who makes every excuse in the world for the Bills and every team that loses to the Patriots. He is the definition of a crybaby ***** loser who should shut his piehole.

 

[GreenCow]

Kupp had control of the ball, took two steps, and made a move common to the game (stretching the ball out) before he hit the ground.

This means that when he hit the ground he had already made the catch so he was a runner, therefore the play stops when he hits the ground.

Surviving the ground is not a factor because he already completed the catch and had become a runner before he hit the ground.

So did Cooks