Who Should We Cut Or Trade From The Roster?

[jdlboot14]

Gregory is an easy choice. Very redundant. We have a great & deep DT rotation with Barmore, Williams, Tonga, Farmer, Durden.

White is a very surprising 2nd choice. He reminds me of Wise the last few years... has all the look of possessing the physical tools but just can't win physically, is too slow, doesn't impose his will, is stonewalled too often. The young guys provide more of a chance to develop than White, who hasn't taken advantage - despite his superior/prototype size

 

[JohnJH]

Nobody unless there's a trade on the table. Posters wanted to get rid of Rham during the offseason. As inconsistent as he is, it would've been a bad move.

Unless they obtain a better RB (or 2) in the Off-Season (FA/Draft).

 

[mgteich]

I don't understand the question. Posters wanted Rham gone before this season started. As much as I don't like Rham, injuries are getting out of hand in the NFL which was why I was opposed to trading him. Gibson was a big loss and would've made the subtraction of Rham as massive mistake. Henderson is not ready to be a lead back on a weekly basis.

???
Let's count to three.
1) Stevenson
2) Henderson
3) the 3rd active RB, not now on the roster. Of course, Jennings will be signed to the 53, after a roster spot was freed up.

 

[mgteich]

and other players ???

Good question, one which doesn't need to be answered yet.

We've cleared a place for Jennings.

We'll see if we need any more spots in the next couple of weeks.
========
BTW, for me, cutting and trading for moving up from the 7th to the 6th is pretty much the same as a cut.

 

[n1997y]

Hey how come Dugger wasn’t a poll choice?

I would’ve voted for him! In fact I’d still vote for him right now!

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

None of the above

Dugger

Good call Boss

 

[Zuma]

So, if we sign a RB and someone else, who you would cut someone else from the roster. Who are the two that you would cut?

WTF are you talking about? Stop with the bizarre hypotheticals. We are not signing 2 RB’s to the 53.

 

[signbabybrady]

Good call Boss

Half right I had to try and be funny with the Brewster's Millions reference and say none of the above but we traded White too lol.

 

[TheRainMaker]

???
Let's count to three.
1) Stevenson
2) Henderson
3) the 3rd active RB, not now on the roster. Of course, Jennings will be signed to the 53, after a roster spot was freed up.

You answered your own question. The RB position would've been a disaster without Rham.

 

[mgteich]

You answered your own question. The RB position would've been a disaster without Rham.

???

Of course, the RB position bwould be a disaster without Rham.

You said that no one would be cut.

So, I asked who the active THREE RB's would be next week, since Jennings is NOT on the 53-man roster.

 

[mgteich]

WTF are you talking about? Stop with the bizarre hypotheticals. We are not signing 2 RB’s to the 53.

Do you understand that we NOW have only 2 RB's on the 53-man roster?

I suggested that we add one RB (presumably Jennings) and one other player, hopefully a safety (perhaps Grant).

I suggested that we move on from White and Mapu. I was wrong. It was White and Dugger.

 

[Zuma]

Do you understand that we NOW have only 2 RB's on the 53-man roster?

No I'm a ****ing moron. Stevenson, Henderson and Jennings on game day. I'll let you do the incredibly difficult math.

I suggested that we add one RB (presumably Jennings) and one other player, hopefully a safety (perhaps Grant).

That is not what you suggested. You suggested 2 RB's. I'll say it...WRONG.

I suggested that we move on from White and Mapu. I was wrong. It was White and Dugger.

And decided to send different messages with the poll....Trade or Cut...which is it?

And stay off my lawn !

 

[mgteich]

No I'm a ****ing moron. Stevenson, Henderson and Jennings on game day. I'll let you do the incredibly difficult math.

.

OK, I give up. There must be new rules and we can now have Jennings active even though he's not on the 53-man roster and cannot be elevated.
======
I think that Jennings needs to be ADDED to the 53 in order to play. Apparently you do not.

 

[Zuma]

OK, I give up. There must be new rules and we can now have Jennings active even though he's not on the 53-man roster and cannot be elevated.
======
I think that Jennings needs to be ADDED to the 53 in order to play. Apparently you do not.

Right?! I mean it's amazing how he's played in 3 games this season without being on the roster. I'm sorry but that is some serious talent to be able to do that.

 

[mgteich]

Right?! I mean it's amazing how he's played in 3 games this season without being on the roster. I'm sorry but that is some serious talent to be able to do that.

ROFL
My point is that he canNOT play next week without being signed to the 53.

 

[Zuma]

ROFL
My point is that he canNOT play next week without being signed to the 53.

Sure...whatever

 

[PlainOldEd]

Right?! I mean it's amazing how he's played in 3 games this season without being on the roster. I'm sorry but that is some serious talent to be able to do that.

No I'm a ****ing moron. Stevenson, Henderson and Jennings on game day. I'll let you do the incredibly difficult math.

That is not what you suggested. You suggested 2 RB's. I'll say it...WRONG.

And decided to send different messages with the poll....Trade or Cut...which is it?

And stay off my lawn !

I think you need to go back and read his posts slowly. You seem to have a comprehension problem.

 

[Zuma]

I think you need to go back and read his posts slowly. You seem to have a comprehension problem.

I absolutely did have reading comprehension issues last night. It generally occurs late at night after a long day at work.