Drunken Cicerone
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2018
- Messages
- 1,444
- Reaction score
- 1,601
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I said this in another thread... Mac Jones can be like truth serum for how well you built your team. I don't think he's a guy who's going to elevate those around you, but I also don't think he's going to crash the bus either. I think he can keep a team afloat. To ever win anything of consequence with him, you'd have to be absolutely stacked around him because he simply isn't capable of making enough plays for you to win high stakes games against the best competition. BUT that's a really good backup QB profile and if he's strategic about who he signs with and an injury or underperformance at QB opens the door for him on the right team, he can have a run - that's kind of what's happening in SF right now, though the injuries might be piling up too high for them to be stacked enough around him for this ton continue.
But also have someone who has done enough to possibly win the role if it’s a nice environment surrounding him.
I don’t really think so. But I could see a team thinking he’s good for what they want. See Sean Payton with Bo Nix.Is it that possible, though? It's not like Sam Darnold who has a good arm and needed time to mature. Mac is not very gifted athletically. His ceiling is Derek Carr, IMO. You're not winning a championship with him. Mac looks good when everything is perfect around him, but when things get stressed like in a real playoff situation he's just not good enough, IMO. Cheers to McVay for getting him to look decent, but it's not sustainable.
Yup, He threw the INT to seal the 49ers fate yesterday.Mac Jones seems to have matured and found a home in San Francisco
This is fair. Mac will allow a team to achieve its talent level and no more or less. TBH I think Purdy is similar. He’ll do well on a stacked team but you’ll never think “wow that’s why they are winning”.I said this in another thread... Mac Jones can be like truth serum for how well you built your team. I don't think he's a guy who's going to elevate those around you, but I also don't think he's going to crash the bus either. I think he can keep a team afloat. To ever win anything of consequence with him, you'd have to be absolutely stacked around him because he simply isn't capable of making enough plays for you to win high stakes games against the best competition. BUT that's a really good backup QB profile and if he's strategic about who he signs with and an injury or underperformance at QB opens the door for him on the right team, he can have a run - that's kind of what's happening in SF right now, though the injuries might be piling up too high for them to be stacked enough around him for this ton continue.
I mean, sure he made some bad plays. It was a loss to a 4-1 team. I don't think saying a QB "won't crash the bus" means he'll never have shaky games. I also said he wouldn't be good enough to consistently win games where you need your QB to really make plays. Some weakness and shaky play is inherent to a player you're describing as "well he won't crash the bus".His play did crash the bus yesterday, IMO. He had two INTs and a fumble. The fumble was totally on him for lacking pocket awareness. It's just luck his team recovered it. Same old Mac.
I mean, sure he made some bad plays. It was a loss to a 4-1 team. I don't think saying a QB "won't crash the bus" means he'll never have shaky games. I also said he wouldn't be good enough to consistently win games where you need your QB to really make plays. Some weakness and shaky play is inherent to a player you're describing as "well he won't crash the bus".
"Won't crash the bus" means "Won't fall apart in the 4th quarter, panic to token pressure and turn the ball over multiple times when behind"I mean, sure he made some bad plays. It was a loss to a 4-1 team. I don't think saying a QB "won't crash the bus" means he'll never have shaky games. I also said he wouldn't be good enough to consistently win games where you need your QB to really make plays. Some weakness and shaky play is inherent to a player you're describing as "well he won't crash the bus".
I'm guessing you missed the 4th quarter yesterday.
Pure, uncut, unfiltered Macorkle Ball.
He was close one game, let me look.Screw-ups aside, did he ever gain 347 yards in a game that he started for New England?
(It might have happened I am too lazy to look it up)
the one game where I enjoyed Devante Parker as a Patriot.He was close one game, let me look.
Nope, hit 321 against Baltimore in 22. The Crying Game.
Well, "won't crash the bus" isn't a generally accepted term. It's a phrase I made up. So it can mean what it means to you, but the way I used it having a bad fourth quarter doesn't mean you crashed the bus. It means you had a bad game. I'm not portraying him as some great QB. I'm saying that if you're a really good team and he's your starter you can post a decent record but you won't consistently win games where the other team is good enough or just plays well enough on that day that you need your QB to really make some plays for you. If you have real competitive aspirations in the playoffs you'll need to upgrade over him, but on a stacked team he can get you there."Won't crash the bus" means "Won't fall apart in the 4th quarter, panic to token pressure and turn the ball over multiple times when behind"
That's what Macorkle did. SF was in that game, until he went Full Macorkle.
Mac Jones will play well for a period of time... and then right when you think he's turned the corner, he will revert to his regular self and do something stupid... we saw it how many times?
Well, "won't crash the bus" isn't a generally accepted term. It's a phrase I made up. So it can mean what it means to you, but the way I used it having a bad fourth quarter doesn't mean you crashed the bus. It means you had a bad game.
Screw-ups aside, did he ever gain 347 yards in a game that he started for New England?
(It might have happened I am too lazy to look it up)
| 11 | 356 |
| 0 | 435 |
| 9 | 2K |
| 13 | 211 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











