- Joined
- Oct 25, 2022
- Messages
- 1,655
- Reaction score
- 1,681
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Washington is a close comparison. That offense outside of McLaurin was bad on paper. On paper, I would say that the Patriots improved more from 24-25 than Washington did from 23-24.That's the point, they hit on the QB.
My belief (right or wrong) is Maye is capable of that with real coaching, a better Oline and better playmakers.
Wash did not have better playmakers last year compared to ours this year.
Brian Robinson is a JAG, Ekler is over the hill, he had 367 yards rushing last year.
McL is great, the rest of their WRs are srubs, much less depth than we have this year.
Washington's Oline was not good last year, I remember towards the end of the season seeing a stat where they were marginally better than our terrible line in 2024.
So no, they did not have a better O last year than we do this year.
They had the QB, and that's the driving factor.
I believe we have the QB this year.
That makes all the difference, turns an average roster into good, a good into great.
Seen it time and time again.
Ridgeline is the go to huh?
We are definitely not there yet, and I was against a Parsons trade for that reason.Washington is a close comparison. That offense outside of McLaurin was bad on paper. On paper, I would say that the Patriots improved more from 24-25 than Washington did from 23-24.
My only problem with the comparison is that we do not now yet if Washington is a flash in the pan or an emerging powerhouse. What they pulled off last year - emerging from nowhere to the top of a conference with a new QB - does happen pretty often, but we have no idea if Daniels is the next Lamar Jackson or the next Robert Griffin, or Trevor Lawrence, or CJ Stroud. The array of outcomes is very wide.
If you are Washington, and you found evidence in the form of production that you found your guy, maybe you make a move for a Parsons. I would not say we are there yet.
A "truck" that identifies as a Mini Cooper?It's 2025, even (ahem... cough) pickup "trucks" are allowed to be gay
It was both.My problems with this explanation:
First it sends a terrible message to the lockeroom.
But more than that we need way more than depth out of those first rounders. If we passed up on Micah and all we get for our patience is some depth multiple years from now then that's not good.
They had a chance at a generational talent and instead chose to sit on the draft picks so the pressure is on to get something better with them and not just depth. I'll be pleasantly surprised if we do better than Micah.
I call BS This wasn't about picks. This was about money.
That’s unrealistic.the core of the roster, the top 10-12 players should be players drafted in the first 2 rounds over the past 5 years.
2025 picks tbd
2019-2025 picks
-Maye, Gonzo, Barmore fall into that category
-Polk, White, Strange, TT, Mac, Dugger, Uche, Harry, Williams do not
It's 2025, even (ahem... cough) pickup "trucks" are allowed to be gay
Ridgeline isn't a truck.It's 2025, even (ahem... cough) pickup "trucks" are allowed to be gay AF
Ridgeline isn't a truck.
last season, Washington was the luckiest team in NFL history.Washington is a close comparison. That offense outside of McLaurin was bad on paper. On paper, I would say that the Patriots improved more from 24-25 than Washington did from 23-24.
My only problem with the comparison is that we do not now yet if Washington is a flash in the pan or an emerging powerhouse. What they pulled off last year - emerging from nowhere to the top of a conference with a new QB - does happen pretty often, but we have no idea if Daniels is the next Lamar Jackson or the next Robert Griffin, or Trevor Lawrence, or CJ Stroud. The array of outcomes is very wide.
If you are Washington, and you found evidence in the form of production that you found your guy, maybe you make a move for a Parsons. I would not say we are there yet.
There’s a good chance WAS falls back to earth this season. If that happens this deal for Parsons a year ago would’ve been a flash in the pan that might have pushed them higher, but only might, not surely, at the expense of mortgaging their future and accelerating their fall this year. It would not have been enough to reverse that fall and sustain them. Sending all those draft picks away would ensure they were in free fall. It would be a move worthy of Dan Snyder.I agree on Parsons, however....
We saw last year with Wash just how quickly a team makes a substantial jump when they get good to great QB play. I believe Maye makes that jump and we outperform expectations.
Think about last year. Say Wash had a chance to trade for Parsons, I'm sure the common thought would be "we aren't one impact player away from being a serious contender". That turned out to be far from true, and would Wash have beat Philly if they had Parsons...maybe.
Again, I wasn't for trading for Parsons, but we really never know year to year what teams will rise and which will fall, we see it ever year where a surprise contender emerges, and others fall. QB play is almost universally always the driving factor.
I take Vrabel's comments a little a different. I take them as an underlying message to the team that no one thinks you are ready to contend this year, surprise me, chip on the shoulder type of attitude he is subliminally implanting. Very smart imho.
So, there's a good chance Wash falls back to earth this year (so that means their future isn't as bright as last year), but they shouldn't mortgage the future to maybe get to the SB last year?There’s a good chance WAS falls back to earth this season. If that happens this deal for Parsons a year ago would’ve been a flash in the pan that might have pushed them higher, but only might, not surely, at the expense of mortgaging their future and accelerating their fall this year. It would not have been enough to reverse that fall and sustain them. They might not slump this year, but I’m not sold on their depth and overall quality, and Parsons at the cost of those picks wouldn’t change that for me.
They weren’t good enough to make it to the Super Bowl last year even with Parsons.So, there's a good chance Wash falls back to earth this year (so that means their future isn't as bright as last year), but they shouldn't mortgage the future to maybe get to the SB last year?
Nothing is guaranteed, so again purely hypothetical, but if you told Washington in the offseason, you are going to the NFCC game, but will lose. Now that's without Parsons, do you want to trade for him? I think they would have 100 times out of 100. But again, purely hypothetical.
I don't think Wash takes a step back however, I think they have a winner at QB and they will be good for quite awhile.
Today. I have a big contract I'm bidding on and it's all over my desk, so I am stressed out a bit.Hence the (ahem... cough) and quotation marks m'fer
FFS when did you get a humorectomy???
Cost Plus? it's easier to beg forgiveness!Today. I have a big contract I'm bidding on and it's all over my desk, so I am stressed out a bit.
I just won't win it. It's a pain in the balls. My own fault, I thought it wasn't due until 9/18. I looked at it yesterday and went "awe fekk".Cost Plus? it's easier to beg forgiveness!
So reading these forums helps you relax?Today. I have a big contract I'm bidding on and it's all over my desk, so I am stressed out a bit.
LOLSo reading these forums helps you relax?
| 6 | 608 |
| 33 | 2K |
| 13 | 593 |
| 6 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











