- Joined
- Mar 3, 2017
- Messages
- 6,877
- Reaction score
- 7,797
Where in this is there any justification for Wolfe's continuing to have a role?Wolf has a title. So what? He does what Vrabel tells him to do. We will see if he’s around or not. I think it depends on how he performs from here on out.
This is Mike Vrabel’s team. I don’t think that guy would have it any other way.
"We'll see if he's around or not." What does this mean? Do we really have to be this gutless and passive in making personnel decisions?
Why would you want to keep someone around in such a position if their contribution is limited to their "doing what they are told"? He is not a gofer, or is he?
We have seen over a number of years under three HC's "how he performs." Why do we need further evidence of his incompetence?
Your view is soft-headed. Guys get fired for doing a lousy job, and should: deal with it.












