- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 16,349
- Reaction score
- 30,108
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I would suggest he was productive in whatever way Josh wanted, or he would’ve been replaced more often.Hollins played 94% of the snaps the year he played for Josh. Something to keep in mind.
His production for that many snaps was not impressive. Something else to keep in mind.
Or they had no one else.I would suggest he was productive in whatever way Josh wanted, or he would’ve been replaced more often.
Yeah I think Unfiltered was thinking the same for a different reason though.If they drafted teams then I guess it is more of a real scrimmage.
I think someone mentioned this before, but they saw Hollins main value as a core STer first and a solid depth WR who you can count on. Kind of like a Chris Hogan kind of guy. I be happy with that.maybe, maybe not...
i see little to no value in Mack Hollins tbh... maybe some good work in camp will change my mind... or it won't
Bourne is the better overall receiver... played exceptionally well in 2021 with McDaniels, and is 2 years younger than Hollins...
I don't hate Hollins, it's just that I don't care about him... he's a bit player not a game changer... but the same could really be said about Bourne at this point...
ymmv
I get what you are sayingmaybe, maybe not...
i see little to no value in Mack Hollins tbh... maybe some good work in camp will change my mind... or it won't
Bourne is the better overall receiver... played exceptionally well in 2021 with McDaniels, and is 2 years younger than Hollins...
I don't hate Hollins, it's just that I don't care about him... he's a bit player not a game changer... but the same could really be said about Bourne at this point...
ymmv
maybe, maybe not...
i see little to no value in Mack Hollins tbh... maybe some good work in camp will change my mind... or it won't
Bourne is the better overall receiver... played exceptionally well in 2021 with McDaniels, and is 2 years younger than Hollins...
I don't hate Hollins, it's just that I don't care about him... he's a bit player not a game changer... but the same could really be said about Bourne at this point...
ymmv
I would suggest he was productive in whatever way Josh wanted, or he would’ve been replaced more often.
Not to toot my own horn (jk, I will) i did say that - although probably not the only one - but I'll repeatI think someone mentioned this before, but they saw Hollins main value as a core STer first and a solid depth WR who you can count on. Kind of like a Chris Hogan kind of guy. I be happy with that.
I hoping we see some of that 2021 Bourne. The Bourne with over 800yds on about 33% of the WR snaps. First plus is he's back with Josh. Second is this is 2nd year after his ACL, supposedly a plus year on an ACL recovery.
I was a big Mayo guy because I met with him, and he was a guy with great charisma and we heard non-stop about his smarts and leadership abilities going in. I knew there would be growing pains, but I didn't know it was so bad until we saw the difference.
At any rate. I think you have to give most of the players a red shirt year, especially the young ones before we make final evaluations on them.
Reiss loves Gillette so much he sleeps with pictures of the empty stadium under his pillow.Upset at Reiss for being a fan? Nope
While playing injured. Last time Hollins was in Josh's system at Vegas he had 57 receptions, 700 yards, and 4 TDs. But you like to **** on players playing injured.Last year, 31 receptions and an amazing 25 first downs and 5 touchdowns.
Mack Hollins Career Stats - NFL - ESPN
Complete career NFL stats for New England Patriots Wide Receiver Mack Hollins on ESPN. Includes scoring, rushing, defensive and receiving stats.www.espn.com
| 149 | 13K |
| 162 | 12K |
| 195 | 14K |
| 281 | 19K |
| 502 | 35K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











