- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 33,758
- Reaction score
- 42,108
there's a limit based on how many LB will usually be on the field. Sure, we could have 9 LB's or 10. But there is a balance. When we run a nickel, IMO, we NEED 10 defensive backs plus Schooler (unless we carry only 24 of Offense (a really bad idea with OL and WR situation.
That likely leaves 14 up front.
If we start 4 DL's (including DE White) that leaves 2 LB's. Even if we argue that that we often have 4 LB's on the field, EIGHT roster positions should give us plenty of backups. If we normally had 4 DB's on the field, there might be more need for a 9th LB.
But that is just my way of thinking about it. Some would exclude DE's and call them EDGE players. I have never done that with other DE's like Wise, but it certainly is a reasonable way of breaking down the roster. And THEN, some call those EDGE players LB's, and leave us with 5 DL's.
What does the OL have to do with that?
“If our base is 4-2-5, then I suggest that there is no need for NINE OL's as you list.”












