Vindicate
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
- Messages
- 4,156
- Reaction score
- 5,975
Saw this piece in the ticker today: Patriots defense looking to be defined by its ‘unwavering violence'
Some interesting quotes I found -
DC Williams: “You gotta play violent, and you gotta play with effort,” Williams said at the time. “The violent element of it, that’s a big part of playing that position. You want guys that accept that...."
Zak Kuhr, LB coach: “I think any style that we’ve been a part of, unwavering violence is a huge part of that,” Kuhr said. “I don’t think size so much (matters). If you’re 6-foot-3, 250 pounds and you have that unwavering violence attribute, it could be the same as a 5-foot-11, 220-pound guy. I’m a firm believer, your actions speak for everything...."
Continuing, “Being aggressive. Being violent. Not turning down blocks. Having a good toolbox of tools to defeat the offensive player, but it’s not just always finesse, but there is some physicality and some violence. We’re huge into guys that don’t mind playing violent football.”
If you read the piece, the staff, at least on defense, is again looking to build from a style-first idea, rather than just measurable.
I do appreciate the language, personally. It's nice to see something that confirms that they're piercing together an identity.
Thoughts?
Some interesting quotes I found -
DC Williams: “You gotta play violent, and you gotta play with effort,” Williams said at the time. “The violent element of it, that’s a big part of playing that position. You want guys that accept that...."
Zak Kuhr, LB coach: “I think any style that we’ve been a part of, unwavering violence is a huge part of that,” Kuhr said. “I don’t think size so much (matters). If you’re 6-foot-3, 250 pounds and you have that unwavering violence attribute, it could be the same as a 5-foot-11, 220-pound guy. I’m a firm believer, your actions speak for everything...."
Continuing, “Being aggressive. Being violent. Not turning down blocks. Having a good toolbox of tools to defeat the offensive player, but it’s not just always finesse, but there is some physicality and some violence. We’re huge into guys that don’t mind playing violent football.”
If you read the piece, the staff, at least on defense, is again looking to build from a style-first idea, rather than just measurable.
I do appreciate the language, personally. It's nice to see something that confirms that they're piercing together an identity.
Thoughts?












