Hugepatsfan
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2024
- Messages
- 2,275
- Reaction score
- 3,532
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Another way to look at it:Kupp 2024 rec 67 yds 710
Boutte 2024 rec 43 yds589
Kupp on a contender, Puka on the other side with a Hall of Fame QB
Boutte with Brissett, a rookie QB, and an OL that doesn't allow much time for a play to develop.
That is typically what follows I know mother****er
I didn’t see this seismic news posted.
I didn’t see this seismic news posted.
And what makes it funnier is Pelissero used a pic of Zappe… in Cleveland uniform!"Zappe, the former Patriots draft pick who finished last season in KC." - ?
He finished last season in Cleveland...
Absolutely, would love both. But if given the choice of either. A. Cooper, Bech, Douglas, Boutte, Polk and Hollins would be a decent group to go with. Baker can maybe fight his way in there.Why wouldn’t you get both?
Kupp may not be the best for a desperate team like the Pats anyway. He would be viewed as a savior, but he wouldn't be here, and he's not a dominant #1 anymore. He's a good #2 for a team with established offense - which is clearly NOT the Patriots.Ugh.
They need 2 starting wideouts. I understand that they don’t want to trade any picks but this is just wasting another year of Drake Mayes development.
So you were just talking out your rear end, then. You said unprompted "they're somehow worse than last year" and I asked how so. Your reply can be summed up as "well, they're not a lot better" which makes no sense.Thank you. You've perfectly summer up my point.
Hollins was added to my post before this reply, I totally overlooked our brand spanking new 35 year old tackle and did you even need to acknowledge the third string QB?
Anyway. I'm not going to argue semantics on if they're worse or not in March. I said what I said. They're not good. Debating if I'm wrong or not when you acknowledge that the offense isn't good seems like a waste of time. If they're better, which is your take, they are only barely better. Not worth the efforts made here.
So you were just talking out your rear end, then. You said unprompted "they're somehow worse than last year" and I asked how so. Your reply can be summed up as "well, they're not a lot better" which makes no sense.
No one is trying to say they're an elite offense, just disputing your contention that they have somehow regressed.
But it's also a position you can trade relatively easy. There are going to be teams in bad situations with their offensive lines because of injury. They will take a LT with upside off our hands if we have a better option.And costs a lot of money.
| 23 | 903 |
| 1 | 297 |
| 13 | 674 |
| 11 | 475 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










