I just googled what the "experts" were saying when Waldren was HIRED as the OC of the Bears. This is what one guy wrote.
"Hiring Waldron gives Eberflus an experienced, creative play-caller who has shown an ability to mix the run and pass. Having worked under Pete Carroll, Waldron knows how to run an offense for a defensive-minded coach and was credited with helping quarterback
Geno Smith to his 2022 Pro Bowl campaign
Looks like is everything a team could want in an OC. He is experienced at play calling, designing game plans, and developing QB's. His hiring was universally lauded as the perfect fit for the Bears and Caleb Williams to thrive with the A level offensive pieces signed for this season.
Clearly he's the fall guy for the Bears offensive woes and Caleb's lack of progress in getting up to speed in running an offense against NFL defenses. But based on his past successful history he looked like he was the ideal hire. But the fact is that so many complex aspects go into how we can evaluate an OC's worth. Some include, player execution, defensive skill (they get paid too), officials calls and sometimes just plain luck, good and bad. A QB throws a bad pass and gets bailed out because of a remarkable catch. or an official's call.n
Now I have had my complaints about some of AVP's calls, just like I had with Josh. But there are so many things that we just don't know about going into the plan making process. Things like player availability on both teams, what D you are likely to see and your adjustments to how you will react to both the expected AND unexpected. Just like with players, before I overreact and fire everyone whenever we hit a speed bump, I want to see the development over some time before I make a judgement. Knee jerk reactions, like I read all the time here, are NEVER what ends up being good judgments