- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 33,731
- Reaction score
- 42,066
You didn’t say it (afaik, I don’t read every post), and I didn’t claim you did. I didn’t put words in your mouth. Did you see the question mark?
My opinion is that Hoyer is NOT better than Zappe, yet he has had a long career. Sure, he’s bounced around, been out of the league, but always comes back. Nine teams have decided at some point that Brian Hoyer is an NFL QB. And if Hoyer is an NFL QB (which he clearly is, according to a slew of teams), and if Zappe is as good or better than Hoyer, then Zappe is also an NFL QB.
Now you might say that Hoyer brings more to the table than his play. Could be. Hard to argue against something subjective like that. But he still might get in a game, and he better be an NFL when he does.
I think your QB evaluation methodology, whatever it is (“I don’t like this player”?) is whack.
If your standard is that anyone who can stay on a roster, but isn’t good enough to win with when called upon, is an NFL QB then you’re right, every QB in the NFL is an NFL QB. Technically speaking that’s correct. If the standard is that an NFL QB is one you can reliably start and win with then Zappe isn’t one, and that’s my standard. And imo Joe Milton has the potential to turn into an NFL QB, and Bailey Zappe doesn’t. So I believe they should release Zappe and keep Milton.












