This whole issue is only relevant if they actually hire a new guy and his hiring is announced.
If the new GM with final say is already with the team, like Groh or Wolf, the dynamic isn't going to change much.
Belichick doesn't do the scouting. He confers with the people who do and he makes the final decisions.
All GMs confer with their coaches and together they select the players most appropriate for the style of play. A GM isn't going to saddle his coach with players he can't use.
The only difference may be something that is spur of the moment, like draft day trades, etc. Look at McVay in Los Angeles. He is in the room at every moment when his GM is making decisions on draft day.
There are BB picks that don’t work out, and for various reasons, doesn’t mean they were bad picks at the time.
Gronk could have easily been a bad pick if his injuries became too problematic for him to play. Someone with Gronk’s talent doesn’t last as long as he did without extenuating circumstances.
Some of his most criticized picks, in the end, were not horrific in context, and the Pats were also handicapped by drafting late in the rounds for 20 years.
Tavon Wilson seemed like a reach, and may have been, but he had a career that lasted a few years and wasn’t a bust.
Duron Harmon caused raised eyebrows, but his play ended up justifying the pick.
Curtis Strange raised eyebrows, but it was wasn’t terrible after further insight.
The one pick which made no sense at the time, and only got worse with more info was Jordan Richards. If this was a team effort between the scouts and BB, how did this one even happen?
I don’t want to make this a post about missed draft picks, because this site has enough insufferable, self-appointed draft experts and dead horse beaters, just trying to add a bit of balance.
BB’s late round gems, like Edelman, and his possibly unmatched UDFA successes, may be unmatched by anyone else.
Certainly there is room for legitimate criticism of BB drafts.