- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 16,372
- Reaction score
- 30,140
It's possible they have been talking but BB decided other areas of the team need more attention.How comes we didn't get First crack?? Did Fat Matt rub him the wrong way??
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's possible they have been talking but BB decided other areas of the team need more attention.How comes we didn't get First crack?? Did Fat Matt rub him the wrong way??
You can look at testing but Perkins is high cut and stiff which shows up on film. Very little COD. Jennings is put together better in terms of physique.What's interesting is that @Wozzy has always been consistent that Jennings is more athletic and a superior prospect to Perkins. I didn't entirely agree, thought Perkins showed more potential and hadn't seen anything to garner any optimism about Jennings in any way, let alone his athleticism.
Lo and behold, Jennings is healthy and dude looks like he belongs. Physical, athletic, setting a hard edge, getting upfield with a pass-rush; he looks like the well-rounded edge in the mold of Vrabes/Ninko opposite Judon. If he manages to stay healthy and produce, a consistent presence at that spot will certainly make the defense better.
I'm very curious to hear your thought process, Wozzy, as to why you have always thought Jennings>Perkins, physically/mentally. I mean specifics, combine measureables, etc. It's been cool to see Jennings appear this season.
37.5 sacks and almost 50 TFLDerek Rivers that's who I was trying to remember what a joke of a pick.
You can look at testing but Perkins is high cut and stiff which shows up on film. Very little COD. Jennings is put together better in terms of physique.
A couple of questions. What does the 5.13 mean, and am I correct in guessing that he DIDN'T run a 3 cone. Or did he run a 6.33 3 cone????You can look at testing but Perkins is high cut and stiff which shows up on film. Very little COD. Jennings is put together better in terms of physique.
37.5 sacks and almost 50 TFL
The problem was that he was their first pick. They used a 1st on Cooks and traded down in the 2nd. There was some hype in camp from him and had a good 1st preseason before the string of injuries occurred.Derek Rivers that's who I was trying to remember what a joke of a pick.
Wow from the GOAT to the JOKE.This has probably already been posted, but I feel bad for Ronnie Perkins, the inevitable target of the Curse of Tom Brady as the player selected with Brady's compensatory pick.
I've been studying up a little on curses and will be offering some directions on how we can collectively put the Kibash on Josh Allen and the Bills.
Brother, if not even you will step up to the plate for the guy... Damn... RIP PerkinsI said it when he was drafted, he's not good enough of an athlete to play OLB, he's not big, strong or athletic enough to play DE... bad draft pick.
They can hold onto him for years trying to develop him, but he never will.
Why me… am I supposed to be overly optimistic?Brother, if not even you will step up to the plate for the guy... Damn... RIP Perkins
Many people don't realize how good of an athlete he was and why he was picked 2nd of the WR's. In fact, there was a reason the other WR's were picked after him as they had red flags to their game.Chad Jackson had the most potential, was the best athlete of any WR in his entire draft class. He was a dunderhead who didn’t prioritize football, as soon as he became a pro he screwed off and didn’t apply himself. If you or anyone can tell us how we’re (or pro teams) are supposed to diagnose apathy in our predraft grades I’d be happy to listen.
Talent isn’t always the reason players or teams fail.Many people don't realize how good of an athlete he was and why he was picked 2nd of the WR's. In fact, there was a reason the other WR's were picked after him as they had red flags to their game.
Same with Maroney. MJD and D'Angelo Williams had red flags.
Derek Rivers couldn’t stay healthy.His skills just didn't translate like some of the others.
5.13 is his RAS score.A couple of questions. What does the 5.13 mean, and am I correct in guessing that he DIDN'T run a 3 cone. Or did he run a 6.33 3 cone????
I wouldn't say that. I'd say you seem like a guy who gives it an honest effort at understanding the reasons why the team keeps a player. So when you flat out don't believe at all in a guy on the roster, well, it carries more weight than if some chicken little were saying it.Why me… am I supposed to be overly optimistic?
We had no luck bc that 3rd RD is one for the ages - Kamara, Godwin, John Johnson, Jourdan Lewis, Kenny Golladay, Jonnu Smith, Kupp, Rasul Douglas and others.His skills just didn't translate like some of the others.
How important is upbringing, morals , ability to overcome hardship and rising through ranks, intent to prove everyone wrong .Why me… am I supposed to be overly optimistic?
Check my draft grades every year going back decades, if I think a player sucks I say so. If I think he’s middling I say so. If I think he has potential to shine I say so… potential is a funny word.
Chad Jackson had the most potential, was the best athlete of any WR in his entire draft class. He was a dunderhead who didn’t prioritize football, as soon as he became a pro he screwed off and didn’t apply himself. If you or anyone can tell us how we’re (or pro teams) are supposed to diagnose apathy in our predraft grades I’d be happy to listen.
The draft is a crapshoot because people are unreliable and because the rate of injury is ridiculously high. That’s why the average NFL career lasts three years and a third of the league is made up of UDFA’s. It’s an imperfect process at best.
Nah, I mean the underdogs make it occasionally, but they're few and far between.How important is upbringing, morals , ability to overcome hardship and rising through ranks, intent to prove everyone wrong .
See more of folks with limited athleticism far outperforming their perceived expectations from lower rounds and UDFA as opposed to first 2 rounds where entitlement creeps in.
Should we look more at underdogs who have always been trampled or considered as lesser mortals for no fault of theirs.
| 4 | 472 |
| 114 | 9K |
| 30 | 4K |
| 17 | 401 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)










