Patsfan1958
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 6,430
- Reaction score
- 12,524
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Christ Jerry is such a whiny *****.
Shows that the Patriot success over the past two decades was attributable to more than just Brady's excellence.
Easy now. You just offended 66% of the posters. I think a classy apology is in order…The people who think it was one or the other are morons.
Easy now. You just offended 66% of the posters. I think a classy apology is in order…
One is a coach one is a player, so not sure how they were ever compared. I will say that though, if Brady was not there for that time, those numbers would not be as good. Bill will tell you over and over, its the players, coaches do not win games, players do. It does not matter what a coach does if the players do not execute, you lose.The people who think it was one or the other are morons.
Yeah you always hear how it was defense that carried Brady all those years, but the offense under Brady was always top 5 every freaking year it seemed. Its weird how stigma works in the media.That point differential is wild. And while I'm of the debate that Brady and Bill are both equally important, the differential speaks to how prolific Brady was as a QB because I'm sure those years of terrible secondaries drag down the diff quite a bit. Those years caused more PTSD than the ineffectual offense of the past two years ever will lmao.
Oh? another "ONE player out of 22 starter makes ALL the difference" theorists. Brady was the GOAT, but football is different from the other team sports. In NO other sport does any individual's play rely on his teammates more than football, and that not just on offense. We've seen many GREAT offenses lose because of poor defenses. So your "its all about Brady" mantra falls flat against the light of reality. And I haven't even mentioned ST's. It wasn't Brady that kicked all those game winning FG's over the last 20 years.How is this possible? Duh...because he had this guy
View attachment 38072
Off to cook up some popcorn...
If you think Brady was just one of the 22 and not the most important then football is not your thing. Brady determines the outcomes of games more so than other players. Sorry I had to break that news. Its funny though that you say Brady is determined by other players, but coaches who dont even play are not.Oh? another "ONE player out of 22 starter makes ALL the difference" theorists. Brady was the GOAT, but football is different from the other team sports. In NO other sport does any individual's play rely on his teammates more than football, and that not just on offense. We've seen many GREAT offenses lose because of poor defenses. So your "its all about Brady" mantra fall flat against the light of reality. And I haven't even mentioned ST's. It wasn't Brady that kicked all those game winning FG's over the last 20 years.
Having "THAT guy" certainly helped, but it pisses me off when people make it seem like it was all about him. Christ, it would piss Brady off.
How is giving facts slurping anyone? Was the OP slurping belichick? Why does mean someone hates belichick if they say he does not have those numbers if not for Brady being the QB because even people who never watched a football game would know that.@Ian and the moderators, Can you relegate the Brady vs Belichick threads to the Brady forum? The Brady era is over, this is a new beginning, and the Belichick haters are just using these threads to spew their hate and ignorance into the main forum. They have an entire forum to slurrrrp on Brady, it would help this forum if they stayed in their lane.
First of all, the comment you were responding to was clearly sarcasm.It wasn't Brady that kicked all those game winning FG's over the last 20 years.