There is some clear science that indicates, for a brief window after recovery, the antibodies are high enough that a vaccine won't necessarily boost the defenses for the immediate future.
The idea that having the disease is a substitute for having a vaccination is propaganda, put forth by people who are not motivated by the health of the public at large.
I had COVID in December. In January, I had a moderate level of antibodies. By April, when my opportunity to get the vaccine came up, the antibodies were down to about 15% of where they were in January.
When my opportunity for a booster comes up, I'll have the antibodies checked again, out of curiosity.
The propaganda is calling it a vaccine. Vaccine's prevent infection and kill sales. Every drug dealer knows you get them on the come back. This is why we have [not]"Vaccine Lotteries" and use the MSM to brainwash the public into thinking a wholely experimental class of therapies was the only answer.
It isnt.
New evidence shows that patients with Long COVID syndrome continue to have higher measures of blood clotting, which may help explain their persistent symptoms, such as reduced physical fitness and fatigue. The study, led by researchers from RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, is publ
scitechdaily.com
A licensed drug normally used to treat abnormal levels of fatty substances in the blood could reduce infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus by up to 70 per cent, a new study in the laboratory reveals.
www.sciencedaily.com
Imagine that! Remember when we thought covid targeted the lungs? Way back when this 'vaccine' was first created to treat the Cov-19 virus? What number is at the end now (cov-2)? Why are scientific names for viruses significant? When was the delta varient (which had 74% breakthrough rate in Ma first week of June, IIRC) first id'd? Google is your friend. I gave the hard answers for free.
The propaganda is blaming the unvaccinated.
The propoganda is altering the definition of vaccine to include an experimental therapy, never shown to prevent infection, in order to authorize emergency use and then full blown approval, before clinical trials have finished running (that's you,
@patfanken and anyone else who 'did the right thing' - you are the trial group).
Funny how the talk of mandates and forced approvals starts around the time these studies see a little press.
Remember when government needed explicit authority to do something?
#MyBodyMyChoice, or does my Y chromosome invalidate the claim to righteous indignation regarding my personal temple?
Further, to the OP who can't understand the gall of the folks who don't trust the FDA (opiate addiction syndrome?! Do you think there was a test case for whether the doc script being written in crayon impacted the wizar-doc's ability to overcome an opiate receptor binding with an opiate? Pencil? What if the doctor wasn't really a doctor, but he had a nice watch and used an expensive pen? All studies need placebo groups), why should any reasonably healthy person under 50-55(?), when looking at the lethality rates, feel obligated to submit to injection with not just an experimental vaccine, but an experimental vaccine produced with an entirely new and until covid, experimental medical technology?
You grandstand on top of false trust.
The medical community interacts with the public daily, yet a large contigent refuse to take this unknown.
Just another means to divide us amongst ourselves and ignore the fact it would be easier to list functional federal government bodies than the dysfunctional.
The list goes as follows:
If you think I missed something, feel free to mention it, and I'll explain why you're wrong to suggest anything. FDA, FCC, congress, senate, [in]Justice Systems and now even our military are woefully incompetent.
Gilmore no question, but Revis was only here for a year,. I would have been more accurate if I had said, "the best safety pick up since Harrison.
