manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 30,077
- Reaction score
- 25,532
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.ST depth. From what I've read online in the past few minutes, he's pretty good at that.
My first thought was LaROOOOOOY JnnnkinsI thought this like a Key and Peele thing at first
My first thought was LaROOOOOOY Jnnnkins
I know there are different ST positions, but how many ST-only players can we really keep? We've got Slater, Bethel, King who are all some of the best in the league at what they do. We also just re-signed Cody Davis to a deal that seems to indicate they expect him to make the roster. None of them are particularly close to Reynolds in physical frame which might give him the edge in a cutdown situation, but 5 ST-only players (not counting kickers, long snappers, or returners) on your 53 man roster seems a bit excessive.Not depth. He'll definitely start on at least 2 teams, if not 4, if healthy.
Bolden tooI know there are different ST positions, but how many ST-only players can we really keep? We've got Slater, Bethel, King who are all some of the best in the league at what they do. We also just re-signed Cody Davis to a deal that seems to indicate they expect him to make the roster. None of them are particularly close to Reynolds in physical frame which might give him the edge in a cutdown situation, but 5 ST-only players (not counting kickers, long snappers, or returners) on your 53 man roster seems a bit excessive.
Hmm... Horde or Alliance?My first thought was LaROOOOOOY Jnnnkins
23 snaps on ST against us in SBLI
Start where exactly?Not depth. He'll definitely start on at least 2 teams, if not 4, if healthy.
BB must've done some thinking about the the 2010 Chargers and got scared about a bad group of ST'ers.
I love weird teams like that. 1st in defense, 1st in offense, last in ST. Didn't make the playoffs.
There was a Nuggets team that had an avg score of like. 120. In the 90s? But had a losing record. Had multiple games above 150 pts, both of which they lost. Lol.
Any other weird abberation teams you guys can think of?
There are usually 4-5 ST only spots (excluding specialists). So my guess is Slater, Bethel, and Davis and then 1 or 2 among Reynolds, King, and Bolden. King hasn't been healthy the last couple of years and I don't know if Bolden is confirmed to be returning.I know there are different ST positions, but how many ST-only players can we really keep? We've got Slater, Bethel, King who are all some of the best in the league at what they do. We also just re-signed Cody Davis to a deal that seems to indicate they expect him to make the roster. None of them are particularly close to Reynolds in physical frame which might give him the edge in a cutdown situation, but 5 ST-only players (not counting kickers, long snappers, or returners) on your 53 man roster seems a bit excessive.
If you can get past the 70's porn music and weird graphics, this is an excellent video breaking down that Chargers team. It's really one of the weirder statistical things in the history of the NFL: