BennyBledsoe
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,295
- Reaction score
- 2,178
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Obesity and age are the two biggest risk factors, followed by diabetes, high blood pressure, and respiratory issues.It is a statistically serious threat only to the elderly.
lol! Did you even read your own article? There is nothing in there that contradicts anything he said.Bet you got your information from fox propaganda.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/08/young-people-coronavirus-deaths/
I think you skipped the day they taught logic in school. Essentially your conversation was:Yeah I thought so- you didn't bother to read the article so you missed the point. Guess it was too much to ask of your limited comprehension skills. Back to fox propaganda for you.
Your previous posts make the above context seem that you say “strikes” when you really means “kills”. If that is your belief, that is one of the most phenomenally ignorant statements I’ve seen on this board on this topic. You must get your info from MSNBC, the network that established that $500 million divided by 327 million people equals over $1 million per personThe point of that article is that the virus strikes indiscriminately, age-wise.
Tompa is approaching Lebron level of social media douchinessThis Tompa Bay thing is incredibly boring. What a lame attempt to create a nickname. I loved Tom until he started buying into the whole TB12 nonsense. Ever since then, I started to learn to root for him on the field and shake my head at some of the nonsense he did off the field.
I’m not sure that’s true. I’d have to see more robust data before I believe it, so please share how you are coming to that conclusion.Obesity and age are the two biggest risk factors, followed by diabetes, high blood pressure, and respiratory issues.
If you are a fat 20-something diabetic couch potato, you are at greater risk than is a lean and athletic 60 year old.
for starters, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid19-obesity-risk-factorI’m not sure that’s true. I’d have to see more robust data before I believe it, so please share how you are coming to that conclusion.
Makes no sense. If a kid wants to get himself killed in a car crash, no problem. That's one less idiot. It's not going to affect the elderly.
You want to go out there and play the odds, that's fine, that's your choice, but you'll also be affecting everyone that you subsequently come into contact with, young and old. And you won't know who will be the worse off for it. And the more you are exposed to the virus, the more chance you have of suffering irreparable harm from it. The infection/mortality rate for front line workers is higher than average by a good margin. Applying statistics or probabilities to something like this is complete horseshit.
All you’ve done is establish that obesity is a risk factor. I acknowledge obesity is a risk factor. What I’m saying is I haven’t seen any data establishing an obese 20 year old is at greater risk than an otherwise-healthy 60 year old.for starters, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid19-obesity-risk-factor
“BMI is the Achilles’ heel for American patients,” says Jennifer Lighter, an epidemiologist at New York University’s Langone School of Medicine. That could be a crucial factor in the death toll, particularly for those under 60, she says. “In China it was smoking and pollution, and Italy had a larger older population, and many grandparents lived with extended families. Here, it’s BMI that’s the issue.”
see also https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20057794v1.full.pdf
Dr. Christopher Petrilli & co-authors examined the factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103 patients with COVID-19 for about one month. Nearly half of the patients were hospitalized. The study found that the strongest hospitalization risks were age over 75, obesity and history of heart failure, in that order.
see also: Obesity in patients younger than 60 years is a risk factor for Covid-19 hospital admission
Yeah, but you're kinda cheating quite a bit. "Obesity" is defined as a BMI of 30 or greater. The study you presented involved people with a BMI of 40 or greater. I think that's where our primary disconnect is.not just "a risk factor" but a huge one. If the French study is right, being obese makes the mortality rate go up 7-fold.
Now, I don't know if being 60 years old instead of being 20 years old, with all other things being equal, makes the mortality rate go up more or less than 7-fold.
I suspect that being 80+ years old instead of being 20 years old, with all other things being equal, does make the mortality rate go up more than 7-fold. But that is an educated guess.
The main point is that age is not everything, and the "over 60" guideline is too simplified.
lol! Did you even read your own article? There is nothing in there that contradicts anything he said.
It never ceases to amaze me how many people think giving an example of a young, healthy person dying overrules the fact that that group is at far, far less risk than seniors.
I think you skipped the day they taught logic in school. Essentially your conversation was:
Sieglo: There are more deaths in people over 90 than under 50.
PP2: Bet you got your information from fox propaganda. <posts article stating that 769 people under age 50 have died>
Seriously.... are you really unable to see how your response does not even remotely contradict or disprove his statement??
Your previous posts make the above context seem that you say “strikes” when you really means “kills”. If that is your belief, that is one of the most phenomenally ignorant statements I’ve seen on this board on this topic. You must get your info from MSNBC, the network that established that $500 million divided by 327 million people equals over $1 million per person
What it does for us is it gives us a valuable insight into which groups are most vulnerable and which groups aren't really all that vulnerable.Obviously you don't get what he was getting at when he was making that statement.
But let me put it this way, okay more people over 90 die from it, than people under 50. So what? What does that do for us?
LOL!! Now you're desperately trying to move the goalposts and hope no one notices. The statement was made that more people over 90 have died from Covid-19 than people under 50. Your response was to ignorantly ridicule that statement while demonstrating a complete lack of rational, logical thinking.Coronavirus doesn't have to "kill" to have a devastating impact on someone's life. Just ask anyone who had to be hooked up to a ventilator, or even just someone who's had to spend any amount of time in an overflowing hospital.
Are you following your dumbass president's advice to inject bleach or using UV light to disinfect yourself?
What it does for us is it gives us a valuable insight into which groups are most vulnerable and which groups aren't really all that vulnerable.
If a group that represents (for example) less than 1% of the population has as many deaths as a group that represents (for example) 67% of the population, that tells us quite a deal.
| 18 | 3K |
| 7 | 781 |
| 17 | 2K |
| 4 | 624 |
| 19 | 947 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 15 - April 30 (Through 26yrs)











