OT: Brady caught in closed Tampa park

[sb1]

https://www.khou.com/amp/article/sports/mayor-castor-tom-brady-caught-working-out-in-closed-tampa-park/

Tom Brady gets politely ejected from closed Tampa park - ProFootballTalk


Deserves an 8 game suspension. Cheating.

 

[sb1]

Weird to title a Brady topic “OT” lol

 

[Patriot Missile]

Park Gate.

Glad he’s not our problem anymore
Not really. Still pretty bummed.

 

[DropKickFlutie]

Totally different conference

.

 

[Deus Irae]

Florio couldn't leave his editorializing out of it. Naturally, he messed it up.


Because Mike Florio

 

[luuked]

Has rented a gigantic mansion from Jeter, has all the money in the world and somehow still ends up working out in a public park during a pandemic.

Weird story.

 

[Brick27]

Florio couldn't leave his editorializing out of it. Naturally, he messed it up.


Because Mike Florio

Yeah that last paragraph especially was pretty shameful to say the least. Thanks, Mike, for being a beacon of truth via strictly a commentary based take.

 

[carmelo15]

Smh but he won’t go to OTA

 

[1960Pats]

No way that was Brady's idea. Gisele made him do it.

I thought people here were sick of hearing about Brady weeks ago.

 

[1960Pats]

Park Gate.

Glad he’s not our problem anymore
Not really. Still pretty bummed.

It will probably hit us when we see him playing in another uniform.

 

[italian pat patriot]

Why he was there i do not understand

Yes...not our "problem" anymore...who cares ?

 

[BTTA]

Has rented a gigantic mansion from Jeter, has all the money in the world and somehow still ends up working out in a public park during a pandemic.

Weird story.

Goes to show that all the money in the world can't save you from family dynamics.

 

[TinhWoodhead]

how dare they treat the goat like that!

 

[Ross12]

Yeah that last paragraph especially was pretty shameful to say the least. Thanks, Mike, for being a beacon of truth via strictly a commentary based take.

Commentary like that doesn't even make sense to me. I see all of these takes all over the place that seem to think that if stay-at-home orders end "too soon" there will be a second wave. Of course there will be a second wave, it's a highly infectious disease, how could there not be? Everyone who has stayed at home has kept themselves from infection and is now at risk of exposure. The point was never to kill the virus, it was to reduce the initial peak and make the load more manageable for hospitals. To that end, I don't know how re-opening tomorrow or re-opening in June is that different from a "second wave" standpoint, outside of a couple areas that are especially hard-hit.

And I especially don't know why Mike Florio of all people feels the need to talk down to us all about it. Not the first time I've seen him do it.

 

[primetime]

Commentary like that doesn't even make sense to me. I see all of these takes all over the place that seem to think that if stay-at-home orders end "too soon" there will be a second wave. Of course there will be a second wave, it's a highly infectious disease, how could there not be? Everyone who has stayed at home has kept themselves from infection and is now at risk of exposure. The point was never to kill the virus, it was to reduce the initial peak and make the load more manageable for hospitals. To that end, I don't know how re-opening tomorrow or re-opening in June is that different from a "second wave" standpoint, outside of a couple areas that are especially hard-hit.

And I especially don't know why Mike Florio of all people feels the need to talk down to us all about it. Not the first time I've seen him do it.

If you "re-open" when there are 5,000 active infections, it's a lot different than "re-opening" when there are 100 active infections. (Just pulling numbers here to illustrate.) Exponential growth happens a lot faster from the former case, and so you end up with overwhelmed hospitals and the need to "re-close" for another lengthy period of time.

 

[PP2]

Commentary like that doesn't even make sense to me. I see all of these takes all over the place that seem to think that if stay-at-home orders end "too soon" there will be a second wave. Of course there will be a second wave, it's a highly infectious disease, how could there not be? Everyone who has stayed at home has kept themselves from infection and is now at risk of exposure. The point was never to kill the virus, it was to reduce the initial peak and make the load more manageable for hospitals. To that end, I don't know how re-opening tomorrow or re-opening in June is that different from a "second wave" standpoint, outside of a couple areas that are especially hard-hit.

The point of the stay-home isn't just to avoid overloading the hospitals.

It's also taking into factor that we don't have vaccine, and we still don't have a proven treatment for this virus.

In an ideal situation (or country), the stay-home restrictions would be relaxed if we had one or both of the above.

My friend's doctor is a well known specialist in infectious diseases and is on the MA coronavirus task force for the Boston area hospitals and she told him that there's still so much we don't know about this virus other than that it's mutating. She told him that the idea that this virus is being contained or managed, is total ********.

 

[scott99]

Has rented a gigantic mansion from Jeter, has all the money in the world and somehow still ends up working out in a public park during a pandemic.

Weird story.

His buddy Trump told him it's ok. I kid, I kid, we are on to Stidham.

 

[scott99]

The point of the stay-home isn't just to avoid overloading the hospitals.

It's also taking into factor that we don't have vaccine, and we still don't have a proven treatment for this virus.

In an ideal situation (or country), the stay-home restrictions would be relaxed if we had one or both of the above.

My friend's doctor is a well known specialist in infectious diseases and is on the MA coronavirus task force for the Boston area hospitals and she told him that there's still so much we don't know about this virus other than that it's mutating. She told him that the idea that this virus is being contained or managed, is total ********.

Lovely , this is gonna last at least a year if I had to guess.

 

[primetime]

The point of the stay-home isn't just to avoid overloading the hospitals.

It's also taking into factor that we don't have vaccine, and we still don't have a proven treatment for this virus.

In an ideal situation (or country), the stay-home restrictions would be relaxed if we had one or both of the above.

My friend's doctor is a well known specialist in infectious diseases and is on the MA coronavirus task force for the Boston area hospitals and she told him that there's still so much we don't know about this virus other than that it's mutating. She told him that the idea that this virus is being contained or managed, is total ********.

To be clear, "mutation" isn't necessarily bad. Influenza, for example, normally quickly mutates into less lethal and less virulent strains, which is why you don't normally get recurrent pandemics. From what I've read, the coronavirus isn't mutating all that much though, which is good in that it won't become more lethal, but the inverse is also true.

 

[PP2]

Lovely , this is gonna last at least a year if I had to guess.

It lasts until we get a gamechanger, either in the form of a vaccine or proven treatment or something else.