- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Philip Rivers has moved back to the East Coast, and it appears it’s for good reason.
According to Jay Glazer of Fox Sports during an appearance on The Herd, the Chargers have “moved on” from the 38-year-old quarterback.
Dislike. Don’t want any more openings for Brady.
If we keep brady, I'm app in in austin hooper.
That guy can slide in and give us 70% of what prime gronk gave us.
Money is an issue but if they can figure it out I think it solves a huge hole for us
Can Hooper block? If not, that figure is below 50% at most.
That being said, even the softest, blocking-averse TE in the league would have a spot on this roster if he could play as a big slot.
It has to make sense from Brady's perspective. And it doesn't. A HC in Anthony Lynn, a perpetually injured team, and playing @ KC and @ Denver is far from ideal. He's not like most other free agents who will just follow the money.This could be big, bad news for the Pats. From the beginning, Brady to the Chargers has made too much sense to me. They need to fill seats more than they need to win games - I know, it sounds crazy. Out here in SoCal, land of splash, Tom Brady would fill seats. They will overpay for him.
Bad OL too, which is one of the biggest complaints about the Patriots. And then you have Keenan Allen who tears his ACL like every other year, maybe the Chargers aren't that good of a situation.It has to make sense from Brady's perspective. And it doesn't. A HC in Anthony Lynn, a perpetually injured team, and playing @ KC and @ Denver is far from ideal. He's not like most other free agents who will just follow the money.
This could be big, bad news for the Pats. From the beginning, Brady to the Chargers has made too much sense to me. They need to fill seats more than they need to win games - I know, it sounds crazy. Out here in SoCal, land of splash, Tom Brady would fill seats. They will overpay for him.
I would think they would go with drafting a QB in the 1st round, and a journey man backup. When the kid is up to speed, he starts, ala Daniel Jones. I can't imagine a rebuilding team signing Brady, and Brady wanting to go through a rebuild. He wants to go somewhere where he can win. The best option for that is the Pats. BUT, if he wants to maximize his paycheck, he will get 30 mill a year for 2 years, elsewhere.
Why not both?I really dont know that but he has all the offensive ability to work around that.
Maybe oj Howard would work too on the cheaper but I believe Hooper could flourish with brady.
Hooper said 4 days ago he hasnt been offered a contract by the Falcons yet so he may be available.
Why not both?
Hooper would be expensive but OJ would be still on his rookie deal and reasonable. It's financially possible.Damn. Alright then.
It certainly would fix alot of issues.
Supposedly Giselle hates LA.This could be big, bad news for the Pats. From the beginning, Brady to the Chargers has made too much sense to me. They need to fill seats more than they need to win games - I know, it sounds crazy. Out here in SoCal, land of splash, Tom Brady would fill seats. They will overpay for him.
Two potential moves I kinda have a gut feeling on:
Rivers to Tampa.
Mariota to the Chargers.