Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
That Raiders team isn’t crap anymore. They’re just young. Their rookie class is producing, though. They’re still a ways off from competing for the AFC, but they’ll be a pain in the ass for the Queefs in short order.
IMO...no. because the current Tom Brady is not a top 5 QB, maybe even top 10. His brain makes him dangerous still but athletically he isn't what he once was, as NO ONE should expect at his age. I also wonder sometimes if a younger, more athletic QB who wasn't as particular about the receivers would be less likely to outright bail on some of the plays Tom has this year. This isn't a bash on TB12...love the GOAT. But more a musing of is it really best for the team for him to be the guy in 2020 vs taking away from developing the next guy despite some stumbles which will come from whomever that guy is.
Yes- I did watch those games and how TB performed.
Those stats aren't overly impressive anymore. 16 QBs have a higher rating. I would still have TB in the top 10 given what he's had to work with, and hopefully he'll only return to closer to usual form as we get healthier on O.
I totally respect your response which is why I was just generally interested into what other people on here thought instead of the moronic talking heads that keep bringing up Brady's contract. I believe BB should be the highest paid coach based on what he has built and continues to sustain as an organization. When it comes Brady, I personally believe that while not the highest statistically, he should be paid if he demands it, based on what he has helped sustain as well. This system is built around Brady and has continually adapted and sometimes modified his game to meet the needs of his offense. He has taken less, which is his choice, so that BB could afford to bring in other talent. I'm sure there's a lot that has gone on behind the scenes that we'll never be privy too. I often wondered if the coaches salary should be tied to the salary cap as well?
I asked it in another response, but I've often wondered why the idea of tying the head coaches salary to the cap hasn't been considered before.
He's leading the league in completions, I know that stat alone doesn't prove anything but I think comparing him to peak TB and current TB may be clouding your judgement. He's still top 5 no matter what Chris Simms says.
Hence why his salary is never made public.
Why would it? They aren't players.
