- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Messages
- 11,998
- Reaction score
- 11,611
I think the game plan was not so gimmicky and just a great concept. Speed over power. Flood the field with fast defensive backs who can tackle Jackson instead of wasting slow linebackers who get juked by him. The Chargers had the secondary to make it work, and so do the Patriots.
The Chargers continuing to play 6-7 defensive backs last year at NE could not have been more stupid, which makes me wonder if they just got lucky throwing stuff at the wall. Putting a little speedy defense out there against that offensive line, Develin, Gronk, Allen and company? It’s like they totally missed the point of why it worked against the Ravens.
I expect Belichick to use similar game plan as SD btw.
There’s really only one thing to stop on the Ravens offense and that’s Jackson. Stop him and they don’t score many points.
I expect he’ll be getting a lot of different looks, unlike Darnold, who basically got like 40 read and react blitzes and no help.
Make Jackson think, not play. If they just play contain it’s going to be tough on the defense. I’d throw a lot at him and mix him up. IMHO, that’s where Seattle was most effective.
Other times, Seattle got pressure from one rusher per play, which meant Jackson could just react and run. Still, TOs decided that game. Metcalf and Wilson made extreme bonehead plays that cost Seattle 14 points. Otherwise, I thought the Hawks were a little more talented, faster and tougher.
Honestly, I’m not in awe of the Ravens. I’ve watched a few of their games (Browns, Bengals, Hawks). They’re an above average team, well coached, some good players. They’re at home, coming off a bye week, and should be ready. But I’m not sure they’re better than the Bills or Big Ben’s Steelers.
SD played 6-7 DBs because they had no LBs. Not sure if that was a game plan or a necessity.