PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Antonio Brown


Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you keep citing Felger as some sort of authority or credible source?

Just saying what he said. And I'm stunned people are dismissing the exempt list thing. Greg Hardy was on it for 10 weeks.

The Pats could potentially be paying him to do nothing.
 
So how, exactly, is human morality not arbitrary?
Because it’s not random or based on a whim. If I kill your child is that immoral because someone just randomly decided it was a thousand years ago and you lack the agency to question it’s morality? Or is it immoral for a more fundamental reason that isn’t arbitrary?
 
Just saying what he said. And I'm stunned people are dismissing the exempt list thing. Greg Hardy was on it for 10 weeks.

The Pats could potentially be paying him to do nothing.
Greg Hardy was arrested and found guilty by a judge before going on the exempt list.
 
Again, Felger doesn't know anything about anything. Why you keep repeating what he thinks, as if there's any weight behind it, other than being the biggest troll in the media market, is beyond me.

Felger has been on a tear lately. First he was LIBERALly applying vagisil because of the 'Do Your Job' documentary where the Patriots players rallied around the "no one believes in us" mantra (which was true, outside of NE the entire NFL talking heads and most fans were saying the Patriots were finished). Even if not true, NO ONE CARES FELGER, ITS NOT A STORY. Then after we beat down Pittsburgh on national TV he moved onto spending all his time on Antonio Brown being a scumbag and the Patriots fans being hypocrites for suddenly giving him a pass once signed. This ALLEGATION will now only fuel the fire for those 2. How anyone takes them seriously after being so wrong so often about the local teams is funny.
 
Because it’s not random or based on a whim. If I kill your child is that immoral because someone just randomly decided it was a thousand years ago and you lack the agency to question that, or is it immoral for a more fundamental reason that isn’t arbitrary?

Is it immoral for an adult male lion to kill rival male cubs?

At one point, it wasn't considered immoral for a human to kill a human child. It's only considered immoral now because we've developed a set of logical axioms concerning the idea of morality.
 
I don't believe human beings are separate or special in relation to the rest of natural existence. It seems you do, which is your choice. I don't fault anyone for that.
We'll have to agree to disagree.
 
Tom Brady is scheduled for a 4 p.m. news conference. I'm sure they will ask only questions about the Miami game plan. :rolleyes:
 
Just saying what he said. And I'm stunned people are dismissing the exempt list thing. Greg Hardy was on it for 10 weeks.

The Pats could potentially be paying him to do nothing.

Greg Hardy beat the crap out of his GF and was surrounded by an mini arsenal.

Not a good comparison.
 
Everyone loves a good comeback story. Man wrongly accused of sexual assault wins the Super Bowl.
 
Just saying what he said. And I'm stunned people are dismissing the exempt list thing. Greg Hardy was on it for 10 weeks.

The Pats could potentially be paying him to do nothing.
Greg hardy was criminally charged.

The two situations are completely different.
 
"based on or determined by individual preference or convenience rather than by necessity or the intrinsic nature of something"

That's from your own link. I'm stating that human morality fits that definition.

If you disagree from a philosophical perspective, that's totally valid. But don't insist I don't know the definition of a word simply because you disagree. Just disagree and be done with it. I'm clearly not irrational and I'm clearly willing to accept that other people feel differently about it.

Human morality as a whole, obviously does not fit that definition, though. What a specific moral code is based upon may be a variable, but that's a different issue. And that's even without getting into the true/false question about the existence of a higher power. You're trying to claim that an orange isn't an orange because it came from a tree that's surrounded by coconuts.

Christian morality is based, significantly, upon the bible, particularly the new testament. Jewish morality is based, significantly, upon the torah. Etc...

What you're trying to argue is that specific moral leanings may be arbitrary, and that such a possibility somehow requires that all morality is arbitrary. That's nonsensical.

There's a good reason why murder is considered immoral, for example, and it has nothing to do with individual personal preference, random choice, or personal whim.
 
Greg Hardy was arrested and found guilty by a judge before going on the exempt list.

AB has thrown furniture off a balcony, got a speeding ticket, no show/benched for week 17 last season, taped private conversations/speeches of two different coaches, helmet drama, Raiders fiasco, and now this. There is history there. Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe Goodell needs evidence to put him out.
 
But again the commissioner can put him on an exempt list. I hope it doesn't come to that. Or at the very least we have AB by the Cleveland game.

We'll have a ruling by Friday, 4pm. That's when the league offices close for the weekend so we'll know at the very least if AB is playing this Sunday or not, by that time.
 
AB has thrown furniture off a balcony, got a speeding ticket, no show/benched for week 17 last season, taped private conversations/speeches of two different coaches, helmet drama, Raiders fiasco, and now this. There is history there. Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe Goodell needs evidence to put him

You're mistaken.
 
At one point, it wasn't considered immoral for a human to kill a human child. It's only considered immoral now because we've developed a set of logical axioms concerning the idea of morality.

Uh... or more likely we just got smarter, as a species.
 
AB has thrown furniture off a balcony, got a speeding ticket, no show/benched for week 17 last season, taped private conversations/speeches of two different coaches, helmet drama, Raiders fiasco, and now this. There is history there. Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe Goodell needs evidence to put him
He didn't get suspended for any of those things. It will be difficult to suspend him for this because it is a civil matter. One which seems to be quickly unraveling.
 
They're asking Brady now live about AB. He's just not answering any of the questions as expected.
 
Felger has been on a tear lately. First he was LIBERALly applying vagisil because of the 'Do Your Job' documentary where the Patriots players rallied around the "no one believes in us" mantra (which was true, outside of NE the entire NFL talking heads and most fans were saying the Patriots were finished). Even if not true, NO ONE CARES FELGER, ITS NOT A STORY. Then after we beat down Pittsburgh on national TV he moved onto spending all his time on Antonio Brown being a scumbag and the Patriots fans being hypocrites for suddenly giving him a pass once signed. This ALLEGATION will now only fuel the fire for those 2. How anyone takes them seriously after being so wrong so often about the local teams is funny.


a felger inspired team would not win a game............ever
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Patriots Draft Rumors: Teams Facing ‘Historic’ Price For Club to Trade Down
Back
Top