- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Source?
WWW.Google.com
Edit
Sorry, I was just being a smart ass, and I can read that it came off badly. It was reported back in recent time (last year, year before).
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Source?
It's Golden Tate.So who was the guy speculating the Pats were going to trade for a top end WR before the season started? Was it Zolak? I'd laugh my ass off if this is the guy he's talking about.
I see nowhere about what you stated.
Again it is a low risk move by bringing him in. If the team is not confident in him they will part ways. If Gordon does get it together (even if it's a small chance) it would be a huge boon to this offense.It's different in Gordon's case because of the anticipation his talent brings and the possibility of someone else losing a roster spot for a headcase that could go off the rails at any moment. I'll be surprised if BB brings him in.
I see nowhere about what you stated.
It's high risk for the reasons I've suggested -- he has proven himself to be highly unstable. That plus his great talent is polarizing.Again it is a low risk move by bringing him in. If the team is not confident in him they will part ways. If Gordon does get it together (even if it's a small chance) it would be a huge boon to this offense.
That is a low risk worth taking, without a doubt.
Predraft doesn't really mean jack, in regards to when Pit. was trading him. Good god, Deus. #speculation
The reasons you have suggested lack validity. Where is the risk in terms of cost? Or the risk in terms of trade? Or that he is a locker room cancer?It's high risk for the reasons I've suggested -- he has proven himself to be highly unstable. That plus his great talent is polarizing.
He's a drugs-first sorta guy.Phenomenal talent in 2013. Wondering if possibly he may not be a team-first sorta guy?
Ya think?Phenomenal talent in 2013. Wondering if possibly he may not be a team-first sorta guy?
I could say the exact same thing about your reasons. I guess we'll agree to disagree.The reasons you have suggested lack validity.
What the hell does that mean? People aren't allowed to point out a couple similarities?It doesn't work that way.
"Rapoport didn’t specify whether New England has called the Steelers about Bryant since the draft, but it would make sense for the Patriots to be looking for a wide receiver"
I edited that post. Re read it. You flat out said people are comparing their talents and off the field stuff in your final sentence...LOL! Gordon has played less than half games possible because of his off field garbage! LolWhat the hell does that mean? People aren't allowed to point out a couple similarities?
BB benched Butler for the SuperBowl. Nobody above the rules. I am skeptical.He's a drugs-first sorta guy.
Maybe he won't change. It would be like his 15th chance. But with a cost of next-to-nothing, I'd STILL be tempted.