- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 16,563
- Reaction score
- 28,671
Its not being negative. Its simply pointing out a players strengths & weakness etc Its busting false narratives on here and in the media.He isn’t perfect and isn’t a certain starter but if he was he’d be talked about as a first rounder which no-one is doing. He is what he is, an improvement on Hoyer eventually with the upside of being a good enough starter to prevent us being desperate enough to trade the lo fora Brady successor. He doesn’t prevent you drafting QBs in the future but provides decent cover in the meantime. The one thing he has is the smarts, character and experience to slot into the system almost immediately. Every year there’s a prospect that gets unremitting hate from draft twitter. Falk seems to be that guy this year and I think it says more about those being constantly negative about Falk than it does about Falk himself. He is what he is, no-one is claiming more than that on his behalf.
Falk as an example, I mean its more than obvious he has trouble under pressure & velocity issues. Believe it or not but some wanted him in the 2nd/3rd. Its being objective just like I am w/ Lauletta and others.
This why I love grades, for better or worse. My opinion is taken out. Also its a lot more clear than I had him in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th etc years later