Actually my argument is very much the opposite, it advocates for a ratings system not against discussion. Hence the "Understanding it's the nature of being on a sports forum to engage in discussion doesn't mean every douche needs or merits engaging." I am more than content to engage in valid discussion, like you it's the reason I am here. I just don't want to wade through 20 no/u posts to get to one post that has merit. I'm not suggesting for a moment the system be done away with. I will not hesitate to engage when I disagree with a worthwhile post but there still needs to be a quick and simple method for expressing dislike/disagreement that is obvious in it's nature. Telling a Stevenson they are a douche only invites more of the same, which only serves to validate their existence and on and on it goes. There are comments even on this thread that show how pointless it can be to engage some folks.
To sum up, when folks post obvious nonsense they don't deserve an explanation. Short of that by all means let's have at it, it is after all why we are here.