PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Daddy Kraft? Denied by Kraft.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but the thing here is, would you seriously get back with someone who's going to have a kid that's been fathered by another guy?
From Kraft's point of you it really depends on the situation. If they were in one of their off periods, then he really shouldn't have much of an opinion on what occurred. Whether she had had a donor or just did it with somebody and decided to keep it. If she cheated, that's different.

But if she didn't, and after the fact, Kraft wanted her around, why not I guess? It's his choice. Dude's a billionaire, he can find someone else if he wants.

Personally I think the man is just looking for someone he can have as a partner in the absence of his wife, and he choose a younger woman who has her own life that she wants to live and children were part of that.
 
Nope. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but the thing here is, would you seriously get back with someone who's going to have a kid that's been fathered by another guy?
At my age, no way. I’m not raising someone else’s child. At Bob Kraft’s age? I’d consider letting a girl I was dating get artificially inseminated if motherhood was *that* important too her and she was *that* important to me.

(Yes I know we don’t know if she was indeed artificially inseminated but I am just describing the conditions by which I’d consider it)
 
She can go after child support. She cannot go after a piece of his businesses.

You seem to forget that what was originally reported was that the kid was his. Then that very same article gave us the report that the Krafts altered the family trust. So basically you're taking a report that got the major point of the entire article wrong, but believing their "oh by the way..." statement.

Has Ron Borges taught you nothing about articles that quote "sources"?
I never said as a GF she can go after his trust.

Believe what you want
 
Yes, me included, from time to time, but not the sort where the girl gets knocked up by another guy. And I just don't see that as being something common, or tolerated by people in general.
It certainly is not conventional or common. There was a point in Bob's life it was.

We have no idea what is going on in her head.
 
The problem is at age 39, you probably don't have time to do all that, and maybe she's happy with Bob and felt she could provide a nice life for a kid.... You watch all your friends and relatives having the one thing you really want, and you feel time ticking away...

While @Tunescribe views are ideal and quite possible in the perfect world, the reality is the issues you mentioned in your post.

1. Egg freezing is a wonderful thing to overcome the ovarian aging process.
2. She probably wanted a child in the immediate future which is why she went this route (assuming she did donor sperm insemination).
3. Unless she is married, no one else needs to give consent for her to be inseminated with someone else’s sperm.
 
Dude's a billionaire, he can find someone else if he wants.

That's the thing that bugs me the most. Plenty of women who would throw themselves at his feet and he goes after a hollywood actress that's dumber than a stump and has the integrity of Ron Jeremy.
 
While @Tunescribe views are ideal and quite possible in the perfect world, the reality is the issues you mentioned in your post.

1. Egg freezing is a wonderful thing to overcome the ovarian aging process.
2. She probably wanted a child in the immediate future which is why she went this route (assuming she did donor sperm insemination).
3. Unless she is married, no one else needs to give consent for her to be inseminated with someone else’s sperm.
You're presenting this as if she had no choice but to act selfishly in gratifying herself at the expense of the life she created. My argument is not for the "perfect world" vs. reality, it's for doing the right thing on behalf of everyone involved. She didn't NEED to deliberately seek a way to give birth as a single woman (assuming that's how it went down). She could have adopted a child with no parents at all. Now that she's made this unfortunate choice, hopefully she'll come to her senses and find a husband to replace her elderly sugar daddy. So far, she's proven to be a vacuously needy weakling.
 
That's the thing that bugs me the most. Plenty of women who would throw themselves at his feet and he goes after a hollywood actress that's dumber than a stump and has the integrity of Ron Jeremy.

I wonder who has less integrity? Ron Jeremy or Goody.

I'll go with Goody. As least Ron Jeremy is open about his sliminess.
 
I wonder who has less integrity? Ron Jeremy or Goody.

I'll go with Goody. As least Ron Jeremy is open about his sliminess.
Peter North is a real man of integrity. If we’re talking about women, Rachel Starr has the most integrity of any woman I’ve ever seen.
 
Peter North is a real man of integrity. If we’re talking about women, Rachel Starr has the most integrity of any woman I’ve ever seen.
Isn't Tyler Faith on this board?
 
just a strange situation..76 year old with a 38 year old? Sorry, but that is just so disrespectful to his deceased wife. Is he really that needy?
 
just a strange situation..76 year old with a 38 year old? Sorry, but that is just so disrespectful to his deceased wife. Is he really that needy?
The heart wants what it wants.
 
just a strange situation..76 year old with a 38 year old? Sorry, but that is just so disrespectful to his deceased wife. Is he really that needy?
You have no idea what Myra voiced to Bob in her last days here in regards to his future.
 
Your own link hurts the point you are trying to make. Your above summary leaves out HUGE details (not to mention the fact that she ultimately lost her case).

The plaintiff was not saying "we dated and lived together therefore I am owed money and assets." The plaintiff was saying "we promised each other we would share all property, therefore I am owed money and assets."

The very basis of the suit you quoted isn't merely that she was his girlfriend, but rather that they had an agreement. And absolutely, if Bob Kraft promised his girlfriend she would one day have a stake in the NE Patriots, then she's got a heckuva case. Of course, there's zero evidence whatsoever that that happened.....
The only point I was trying to make was to rebut a previous posters' comment that as a girlfriend vs wife, she had no rights. My point was simply that it was not cut and dry and that there are nuances and even though a girlfriend ( like Triola) wasn't married, under certain circumstances she can have property rights absent a marriage license. Yes, there were promises to share and courts upheld this but to say, "she's girlfriend, she has no rights" is also incorrect. My only point was that there is a grey zone into which the Lee MArvin case fell where a girlfriend had property rights..
 
I never said as a GF she can go after his trust.

Believe what you want
You said:

“For me the biggest news is the sons had the trust amended with enhanced safeguards so she couldn't have a chance at swooping in and pulling a Anna Nicole Smith.”

You clearly thought she can go after his money and they needed to amend the trust to prevent that. Hopefully I’ve shown the error of that thinking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top