- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,775
- Reaction score
- 38,038
Hahahah good. **** those fat peckerheads and their pill-popping owner. Who does Indy get on the phone now? Frank Reich?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hahahah good. **** those fat peckerheads and their pill-popping owner. Who does Indy get on the phone now? Frank Reich?
I’m not meaning to suggest that my opinion is correct and that yours is wrong, but I do think that it’s a pretty telling sign when upper management gives one coach a significant raise to stay, while letting another go.
For me, that suggests that they see McD as the heir apparent HC in waiting, and that they did not want to lose him—at least compared to Patricia, anyway. If they had wanted him to stay so badly, they could’ve offered him more money, made him an assistant HC, or both. Again, just my opinion.
So the first argument for this point of view is to try to negate its opposite (the idea that Josh doesn't want to be a HC soon.) Then after telling me your opinion of somebody else's interior state, you posit a world of 30 other NFL owners, who immediately come to the same ironclad conclusion (Josh is now radioactive.) None of them is aware that Irsay might be problematic to work with.
I mean, sure, if Josh is an interchangeable part, like a burger flipper. If they're even thinking about what he brings, he's not. They're in the position of hiring from among a handful of people who show the requisite promise. This isn't replaceable workerbees, it's elite recruiting.
I can make up characterizations too.
This could be as simple as "do you really want to stop working with TFB on a loss year to go work for an old psycho drunk?"
Despite what we say on here, BB gives you a chance to win every year (even if OMFG he benched M.B.!!!!) Luck might not be all that well. Colts ownership might not be what he wants to surround himself with.
And, it's a descent into the mortal world from the Olympian heights of New England. You remember before 2001, how you didn't have any idea whether and when we'd ever be relevant again? Going to the Colts now is walking out of a NE machine that works, to basically risk being the next post-patriots disappointment (and walking into the disarray of Irsayland in the process.)
Maybe this reeks of deja vu after leaving after a SB loss last time (a year removed, if I remember correctly.)
And so on, and so on, and so on.
All I asked is whether there's evidence of any of some heir-apparent status. By setting up the cascading if-thens above, you told me there isn't. No knock on you, if we could only talk about things we know to be the case, it would kill the board.
I just don't know how anybody can be so sure of this world... there seem to be so many ways it could be off. We're starting with others' internal states, which is tough enough in the normal world where people can lie. In the NFL world every statement is made with knowledge that fans and media must be managed.
Just like the endless benching argument, we just don't have reliable intel.
Tough division to start ones hc carer on, with Rodgers in green bay and a seemingly resurgent Minnesota team.
WOAH
Those guys badly need to get laid. Their cousins must be out of town.Lmao
He’s not going to get another head coaching shot anytime soon.The man put the needs of his family over the needs of his own legacy ... regardless of his talent the man gets my total respect and admiration. If he never gets another shot at head coach so what ... he has already proved himself a winner for following his convictions.
He will maybe in 5+ years when it works with the needs of his family...in the meantime he has the best head coaching gig there is ... father of a well cared for family.He’s not going to get another head coaching shot anytime soon.
not if you like corn fields and hicksJosh finally realized that Indiana is a terrible place to live.the place is a cesspoll
And raging incest and meth. How many fat slobs do you think are on their taxpayer-funded Rascal scooters on the way to the gas station to pick up gas station bacon and a 6-pack of Bush Light in Indiana as we speak?not if you like corn fields and hicks
And raging incest and meth. How many fat slobs do you think are on their taxpayer-funded Rascal scooters on the way to the gas station to pick up gas station bacon and a 6-pack of Bush Light in Indiana as we speak?
And raging incest and meth. How many fat slobs do you think are on their taxpayer-funded Rascal scooters on the way to the gas station to pick up gas station bacon and a 6-pack of Bush Light in Indiana as we speak?