SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Could he be a source? Pretty close to things...
totally. People around here should look at the situation more honestly.Exactly. The statement says there are theories out there that are "unsubstantiated" (which implies those theories may be true) and "highly exaggerated" (which outright says that there's something there, but ESPN stretched it).
Their presser did that. I'm not sure what else you want them to say.I have to say, the Pats coordinated response is weak. They could have outright denied all this but that statement does not do that. Some of this true and we all know it.
**** man we are losing Brady and Jimmy G dumbass B.B. is handing the team to Hoyer. Wait that’s if Kraft doesn’t fire him than we lose All 3
His amazing sources essentially got everything wrong when it comes to specific things. There is no PotW award, Brady didnt carelessly injure Hogan, Brady doesn't want to be called "sir", BB didnt meet with Goodell last week, TB12 was never locked for JG....
Great sources.. all that is left is innuendo
I think posters here are being fairly naive about all this. No doubt that Belichick is not leaving the Pats. But something is up that Belichick is not happy about.If Holley wants to write another book with authorized access on the Patriots, he would never be the source for anything like that. Holley's one of the good ones, so it's sad to see him taking this as gospel.
Listening to Wickerdick on EEI right now, he sounds like a tool.
the statement I read did not deny it at all. Did they have a press conference?Their presser did that. I'm not sure what else you want them to say.
Exactly. The statement says there are theories out there that are "unsubstantiated" (which implies those theories may be true) and "highly exaggerated" (which outright says that there's something there, but ESPN stretched it).
Read this. Holy **** this guy is warped.
for example @TB5XSBWtotally. People around here should look at the situation more honestly.
Was strange to see those examples. Good to see them debunked because they're some of the sort of outrageous defaming type things and made the story more sensational than necessary.
Some of Wickersham's past articles in 2017 indicated access to Brady and Belichick family / friends. I wonder how he can get close like that while also seemingly getting it wrong that JG was locked out of TB12 with a conspiracy-laden tone.
I think posters here are being fairly naive about all this. No doubt that Belichick is not leaving the Pats. But something is up that Belichick is not happy about.
Honestly I would not blame Kraft to order no trade on Brady. (I don't think the is what happened, and that may be what the statement discusses as "exaggerated")
Moving on from Brady would have been stupid and sad and it is not comparable to Montana and Young. Montana was down for nearly two years!
You need to change your screen name soon... and get a clue..for example @TB5XSBW
This is a good take about who may have leaked the original report that the ESPN story was coming to Bruce Allen. It may wind up hurting ESPN in the long term.
the statement I read did not deny it at all. Did they have a press conference?